From the Rizal Bill to the Rizal Law
1. Senate Bill No. 438 was filed by the Senate Committee on Education on April 3, 1956
2. On April 17, 1956, then Senate Committee on Education Chair Jose P. Laurel sponsored the bill and began delivering speeches for the proposed legislation
3. The bill became controversial as the powerful Catholic Church began to express opposition against its passage
4. Claro M. Recto, and his allies in the Senate entered into a fierce battle arguing for the passage of SB 438. Debates started on April 23, 1956
5. House Bill No. 5561, an identical version of SB 438, was filed by Representative Jacobo Z. Gonzales on April 19, 1956
6. The House Committee on Education approved the bill without amendments on May 2, 1956 and the debates commenced on May 9, 1956
7. A major point of the debates was whether the compulsory reading of the texts Noli Me Tángere and El Filibusterismo appropriated in the bill was constitutional. The call to read the unexpurgated versions was also challenged
8. Senator Jose P. Laurel proposed amendments to the bill on May 9, 1956 to remove the compulsory reading of Rizal's novels and added that Rizal's other works must also be included in the subject. He, however, remained adamant in his stand that the unexpurgated versions of the novels be read
9. Similar amendments were adopted to the House version on May 14, 1956
10. The amended version of the bills was also subjected to scrutiny but seemed more palatable to the members of Congress
11. The allies in the House skillfully avoided the insertion of any other amendment to prevent the need to reprint new copies (which would take time). They also asked the Bureau of Printing to use the same templates for the Senate version in printing the House version
12. On May 17, 1956, the Senate and House versions were approved
13. The approved versions were then transmitted to Malacañan and on June 12, 1956, President Magsaysay signed the bill into law which became Republic Act No. 1425