Save
...
Paper 1
Social Influence
Resistance to social influence
Save
Share
Learn
Content
Leaderboard
Learn
Created by
Sophie Kimber
Visit profile
Cards (9)
Social Support : Asch
When
dissenter
introduced, conformity dropped -
5.5
% for
correct
answer,
9%
for
incorrect
answer but still different
Social Support : Asch (Why?)
Majority
is not longer
unanimous
NSI
avoided
Pressure
reduced
Social Support : Milgram
Rebelling
peers meant only
10%
went to
450V
Social Support : Milgram (Why?)
Peers
act as model of
dissent
Challenges
legitimacy
of authority
Pressure
reduced
Locus of control
A person's
perception
of
personal
control over their behaviour
Strong
internal
LOC
Can
control
or influence their
life
events
More
likely to
resist
and take
responsibility
Strong
external
LOC
Outside
factors such as
luck
or
fate
influence their life events
Less
likely to take
responsibility
or show
independent
behaviour
Holland
repeated
Milgram's
study and measured if they were internals or externals. Found
37
% of
internals
disobeyed while
23
% of
externals
disobeyed
Twenge
et al - meta analysis of American LOC studies over
40
years. Found people became
more
resistant
to obedience but also
more
external