identifying the real reason & determining the identity of the accused
it is a personalright
A warrantless arrest/search cannot be opposed by other persons
only the person to be arrested & the owner of the house to be searched who could contest the act
2. Not all warrantlesssearch/arrest are unreasonable:
EXEMPTIONS
Movingvehicles
checkpoints established by the military
Warrantless searches
search incidental to arrest
limited search on the person & on the immediate vicinity where the arrest was made
STEP 2: Custodial Investigation : any questioning initiated by law enforcement officer after a person has been deprived of his freedom
DUTIES OF THE ARRESTINGOFFICER
Deliver the arrested suspect to nearest jail & file complaint with the municipal judge or fiscal for preliminary investigation
Art. 3, Sec 12:2: You cannot be brough to secret or solitarydetention places
Art. 3, Sec. 12:4: Torturers will be prosecuted
Give the required constitutional warnings
it is the duty of the arrestingofficer to inform the suspect of the reason of the arrest
make him understand his right
Miranda vs. Arizona (1973)
“Miranda Rights” ; Art. 3, Sec. 12:1
Peace officer who violates his duties is given administrative Punishment
If Miranda Rights are violated, the case may be dismissed
Right to RemainSilent
No inference of guilt may be drawn against the accused for his silece
unless prosecution has primafacie case against him
PrimaFacie
evidence sufficient for proof unless denied
Right to competentcounsel
protect accused from answering questions that may be self-incriminating; attaches only when police start questioning
can be waived by a person but only in writing & presence of a counsel
All uncounselledconfession, even if it is the truth, & even if its free & voluntary, is inadmissable in court
Imposter lawyer = mistrial
2. Fruit from the PoisonousTree Doctrine (Art. 3, Sec. 12:3)
All information, evidence or material gathered through violation are inadmissible as evidence against the accused
STEP 3: Preliminary Investigation
all the evidence gathered are given to the municipal judge or prosecutor
Failure to establish prima facie will result in the outright dismissal of the case
Preliminary Investigation secures the innocent from the trouble, expense, & anxiety of a public trial
Preliminary determination of probable cause will result in the issuance of am arrest warrant by the Municipal Judge to the defendant or a subpoena by the fiscal of the defendant
Requisites for valid warrant: protectuis from being arrested arbitrarily due to whim
Probable Cause: competent proof to make a prudent man believe a crime has been committed
Mere suspicion does not constitute probablecause
PersonalDetermination by the Judge: Judge must personally examine in the form of searching questions & answers, in writing & under oath the complainant & the witnesshe may produce
Evidence must be based on personalknowledge of the accuser
hearsay is not allowed
Fake statements could be charged with perjury
Particular Description: specifying descriptions or distinct physical marks is included
Preliminary Investigation can be done away with if the person has been lawfully arrested without a warrant