HEALTH EDU

Cards (173)

  • Evidence-based practice (EBP)

    A method of review and assess high-quality research to inform the delivery of care. It involves the integration of evidence in a holistic, patient-centered approach in healthcare.
  • Benefits of EBP
    • Leads to high quality care
    • Reduces health costs
    • Decreases denials and increases reimbursement
    • Reduces geographic variations
    • Reduces turnover rate
    • Meets public expectations
  • Components of EBP

    • Best external evidence
    • Patient values and expectations
    • Individual clinical experience
  • Users of EBP
    • Healthcare providers
    • Researchers
    • Faculty
    • Students
  • Hierarchy of Evidence (most to least credible)

    • Randomized controlled trials
    • Evidence from cohort, case-control, or observational studies
    • Expert opinions that are supported by experience, studies, or reports
    • Personal experience
  • McMaster's hierarchy of evidence
    • Original research
    • Evidence summaries, systematic reviews, and meta-analyses
    • Clinical decision support
  • JBI's Levels of evidence (Joanna Briggs)
    • Level 1 (unequivocal findings, SR, RCT, cost of alternative interventions)
    • Level 2 (credible synthesized findings, Quasi-experimental, cost of alternative interventions)
    • Level 3 (credible synthesized findings, Cohort and observational studies, limited alternatives)
    • Level 4 (Expert opinion with limited critical appraisal, Physiology, Bench research, consensus based on economic theory)
  • McMaster's hierarchy of evidence - from most to least credible
    • Randomized controlled trials
    • Evidence from cohort, case-control, or observational studies
    • Expert opinions that are supported by experience, studies, or reports
    • Personal experience
  • JBI's Levels of evidence (Joanna Briggs) - takes a broader view on research evidence, and has a more unique level of evidence where in each level, FAME (feasibility, appropriateness, meaningfulness, effectiveness) is reviewed

    • Level 1 - unequivocal findings, SR, RCT, cost of alternative interventions
    • Level 2 - credible synthesized findings, Quasi-experimental, cost of alternative interventions
    • Level 3 - credible synthesized findings, Cohort and observational studies, limited alternatives
    • Level 4 - Expert opinion with limited critical appraisal, Physiology, Bench research, consensus based on economic theory
  • Cochrane model (1970) - states that evidence-based practice leads to better healthcare outcomes

    1. Record
    2. Question
    3. Experiment
    4. Analyze
  • Cochrane model - sources of evidence
    • External evidence - systematic reviews, randomized control trials, best practice, and clinical practice guidelines
    • Internal evidence - healthcare provider expertise, quality improvement projects outcome management initiatives
    • Patient preferences (what patient want) and values (QoL)
  • Advantages of EBP
    • Improving patient outcome
    • Maximizing time, reducing cost
    • Contributing to Nursing science
  • EBP Methodologies
    1. Ask - formulate questions about a patient, problem, interventions, etc.
    2. Acquire - search for relevant evidences to answer questions
    3. Appraise - determine the quality of the sought evidence
    4. Apply - make clinical decisions using the evidences
    5. Assess - evaluate the use of evidence to the patient
    6. Disseminate - sharing the research and evidence to colleagues
  • Additional EBP Methodologies
    1. Identify - find the aspect that needs improvement. Form PICOT questions about the population, intervention, comparison, outcome, and time.
    2. Research - review relevant research which are peer-reviewed and reliable. Find the review of literature.
    3. Evaluate - looks for high-quality information and sources that support ideas.
    4. Choose interventions - look for the best way to implement the idea and monitor its progress.
    5. Re-evaluate - determine the success of interventions. Review data and include revisions to summarize results.
    6. Disseminate - place the idea on existing literature and share it to other professionals.
  • Additional EBP Methodologies
    1. Search and find research or evidence
    2. Appraise the evidence
    3. Implement the evidence
    4. Evaluate practice changes and patient outcomes
  • JBI EBP Methodology (J. Briggs) - international, non-profit, and membership-based research and organization
  • JBI EBP Methodology

    • Healthcare evidence generation
    • Evidence synthesis
    • Evidence transfers
    • Evidence utilization- evaluate
  • Applying Evidence-based Practices
    • Giving oxygen to patients with COPD - use of research-based procedures to properly administer oxygen to patients with COPD
    • Measuring BP of children - comparing the results of auscultatory method with data from oscillometric method
    • Catheterization - using the correct size of intravenous catheter to improve patient comfort
    • Recognizing family objectives - valuing the role of family members, and recognizing their influence on how the patient presents symptoms
    • Improving infection control - understanding the importance of wearing personal protective equipment and practicing handwashing
    • Recognizing alarm fatigue - creating protocols to ensure that nurses desensitized to sounds due to alarm fatigue are monitoring patients correctly
  • Types of Research
    • Quantative - intervention or outcome research based on science method
    • Qualitative - involves understanding human behavior, and observation of culture, beliefs, actions, and adaptations
  • Quantative Research
    • Clinical trials - exposure status is assigned
    • Randomized controlled trials - randomized assignment to exposure
    • Cohort study - observational study in which people are followed forward
    • Case-control study -



    • Case report (case series) - descriptive study without comparisons
    • Meta-analysis - analyzes studies related to the hypothesis
    • Clinical practice guidelines - identifies and summarize evidence on prevention, diagnosis, prognosis, and treatment
  • Qualitative Research
    • Phenomenology (philosophy) - focuses on individual meanings
    • Ethnography (anthropology) - focuses on culture, and social meanings
    • Grounded theory (social sciences) - generates explanations and theories
    • Action research (social sciences) - interacting with members for change
  • Systematic reviews (meta-analysis) - highest level of research which examines quantative and qualitative evidence separately or together. It brings the same level of rigor to reviewing research evidences.
  • Systematic reviews are based on peer-reviewed protocols with minimum of 2 people. It examines FAME: feasibility, appropriateness, meaningful, and effectiveness.
  • Outcome-based education (OBE)

    Learning with clear objectives, and focusing on the results rather than the process of learning
  • Types of Outcome-based education
    • Traditional
    • Transitional
    • Transformational
  • Grounded theory (social sciences)

    Generates explanations and theories
  • Action research (social sciences)

    Interacting with members or change
  • Systematic reviews (meta-analysis)

    Highest level of research which examines quantitative and qualitative evidence separately or together. It brings the same level of rigor to reviewing research evidences.
  • Systematic reviews
    • It's based on peer-reviewed protocols with minimum of 2 people. It examines FAME: feasibility, appropriateness, meaningful, and effectiveness.
  • Outcome-based education (OBE)

    Learning with clear objectives, and focusing on the results rather than the process of learning.
  • Outcome-based education
    • It's practical - involves understanding things, and making decisions
    • It's fundamental - involves apprehending what you are doing and why
    • It's reflective - involves learning through self-consideration
  • Types of OBE
    • Traditional
    • Transitional
    • Transformational
  • Components of OBE
    • Curriculum design
    • Teaching and learning methods
    • Assessment
    • Continual quality improvement
    • Monitoring
  • In outcome-based education

    Learners engage with the subject matter, instead of memorizing theory
  • In outcome-based education
    Assessment is performance-based, testing if the learners can apply their skills and knowledge unlike in traditional exams
  • Differences between Outcome-based and Traditional Education
    • Practical skills, competencies, and real-world applications vs Transfer of content knowledge to learners
    • Active learning vs Passive learning
    • Critical thinking and problem-solving vs Theoretical understanding and practical application
    • Flexible and adaptable in changing industry and society vs Established knowledge rather than current trends
  • Principles of OBE
    • Clarity of focus - educators and learners understand a shared objective, which is explicit and measurable
    • Designing back - educators begin with identifying desired outcomes and design the curriculum to achieve them
    • High expectations - learners are believed to have greater competence with provided with right support and encouragement
    • Expanded opportunities - OBE is inclusive and ensures that all learners thrive given appropriate opportunities
  • Objectives of OBE
    • Course outcomes (CO) - OBE aids instructors design effective teaching strategies, assessments, and learning activities that align with objectives
    • Program outcomes (PO) - OBE includes cumulative learnings from multiple courses within a program
    • Program educational objectives (PEO) - OBE reflects an institution's mission and commitment to prepare graduates for the workforce
    • Global opportunities - OBE encourages educational institutions to provide opportunities for cross-cultural experiences, international collaborations
  • Ethics (ethos: character)
    A systematic mode of inquiry in understanding morality, the rightness and wrongness of action
  • Ethics
    Defines the expected standards for moral behavior. It's the critical reflection and rational analysis about morality.