An argument suggesting that proof of God'sexistence can be seen through the evidence of design in the world
Design argument
It is empirically based (based on observation)
Examples: complexity of the human eye, regularity of the seasons
Idea that these things cannot have happened by chance, so there must be an intelligent designer (God)
William Paley's watchmaker analogy
The fact that a watch requires a watchmaker because of its complexity and regularity leads to the conclusion that the world must have a 'worldmaker' (God) because the world is much more complex than a watch
The Bible (Psalms) says the heavensdeclare the glory of God, the skies proclaim the work of his hands
Anthropic principle
The idea that the world has been 'fine-tuned' for human life to develop and flourish, which cannot have happened by chance, so there must be an intelligent designer (God)
The Quran teaches that God'sexistence can be discovered through observation of the naturalworld
The design argument is challenged by science
Evolution shows the world was not designed for us, we adapted to it
The design argument is criticised by David Hume
The analogy of the world being like a watch is flawed, as the world is more like an organicvegetable than a machine
Richard Dawkins believes design is an illusion, and natural selection is the 'blind watchmaker'
The design argument is an attempt to provide empirical proof for the existence of God
The world was not designed for us, we adapted to it
Naturalselection is the drivingforce behind evolution
Design is an illusion, we adapted to the world
The analogy of the world being like a watch is flawed
The world is more like a vegetable than a machine
If a ship takes many men to design and build, then the world would take many gods to design
The evidence of design does not lead to belief in an omni-benevolent, omnipotentdesigner
Flaws in the design, such as natural disasters, suggest the designer is not omnipotent or omni-benevolent
Naturecommits all the crimes for which men would be executed, it is a designedly imperfect world
Everything in the world has a cause, so the universe must also have a cause
The chain of cause and effect cannot go back infinitely, there must be an uncaused cause
Uncaused cause
The first cause that started the chain of cause and effect
St. Thomas Aquinas said God is the necessarilyexistent first cause of the universe
The Quranic argument (Kalam) says everything that begins to exist has a cause, the universe began to exist, therefore the universe has a cause
If everything has a cause, what caused God?
The fallacy of composition assumes what is true of the part is true of the whole
Even if there is a first cause, there is no proof it is God
Christianity is based on the miracle of Jesus' resurrection
Islam is based on the miraculous revelation of the Quran
Miracles show God's immanence and concern for the world
Miracles raise questions about God's omni-benevolence and fairness
Miracles could be misinterpretations or coincidences, not supernatural events
There are going to be extraordinary things that happen, but it is all down to chance
Just because something seems incredible and very unlikely, that doesn't mean it's a miracle
If it happened to an atheist, they might just say it was really good luck, whereas someone raised in religion would see it as a miracle
The importance of miracles is that religion is based upon them, they give people hope for life after death, and they confirm the nature of God as caring and immanent
Evil and sufferingchallenge the existence of God
Theodicy
Religiousresponses to the challenge of evil and suffering
The inconsistent triad - three statements that cannot be simultaneously true
God is omnipotent
God is Omnibenevolent
Suffering exists
How evil and suffering challenge God
It challenges God's Omnibenevolence because the existence of evil suggests God doesn't care
It challenges God's omnipotence because the existence of evil suggests God isn't powerful enough to remove it