Law paper 3

    Cards (51)

    • Defined by lord Coke 

      Murder is the unlawful killing of a human being under the kings peace , with malice aforethought, express or implied
    • Unlawful killing
      It wasn’t a lawful killing such as it occurred through an act of self defence. The killing can be through an act or omission
    • Unlawful killing case

      Gibbins and Proctor - dad and step mother starved 7 year old Nelly to death. LBO for murder
    • Human being
      Foetus, life suppourt
    • Under the kings peace
      Not at war
    • Under the kings peace case

      Adebolajo - sentenced to prison convicted of murder, courts look at v’s situation rather than D’s mind
    • areas of murder 

      Actus reus( unlawful killing, human being, under the kings peace). Causation( legal and factual). Men’s rea( direct intent, oblique intent)
    • Direct intent
      • Adebolajo
    • Direct intent for GBH 

      Desires serious harm but for GBH - desires V dies
    • Oblique
      Indirect intent to cause harm - desires a certain outcome but an unintended death occurs instead
    • Direct intent to kill

      Desires the outcome and desires the death to occur
    • oblique intent to kill example 

      • D plants a bomb trying to kill a desired victim on a plane but ends up killing everyone else
    • Oblique intent for GBH

      Desires to cause GBH but a different outcome occurs such as death
    • Cases for Oblique intent
      1. Woolin-□ threw baby towards pram, missed and baby dies
      2. Death or serious harm was a virtual certainty
      3. Knew it was a virtual certainty
    • Voluntary Manslaughter
      If the defendant is charged with murder, partial defences are available to reduce the charge
    • Diminished responsibility
      is under S.2 of the homicide act 1957 but has now been amended by S52 of the coroners and justice act 2009
    • Abnormality of mental functioning 1. DR

      D's functioning was so different from the ORP the reasonable man would deem it abnormal. Case ( byrne, he was unable to control his perverted desires, successfully claimed dr as he had a AMF)
    • Recognised medical condition 2. DR

      Any condition recognised by the WHO, cases Brown ( D was found guilty of manslaughter on grounds of diminishes responsibility) Ahluwalia( D was found guilty of murder but on appeal it was reduced to manslaughter on grounds of dr)
    • Substantially impaired 3. DR

      The RMC must substantially impair D's mental responsibility to do one of three gateways
    • Three gateways

      • Understand the nature and conduct of their actions
      • Make a rational judgement
      • Exercise self-control
    • Provides an explanation HA 1957 

      Means there must be a casual link between the defendants mental abnormality
    • Just drunk

      Not a defence of DR
    • Drunk & an AMF/RMC

      Alcohol Dependency (ADS) is a recognised medical condition
    • Dietschmann (2003): 'If D is drunk at the tive jury are to remove the intoxication and look of the RMC alone, Adjustment disorder.'
    • Stewart (2009): 'D Was a chronic alcholic Milled - ma during a fish. Appodea got ApS'
    • Drunk and an amf/rmc
      Take out the alcohol and see if the d would do the same in the situation
    • loss of control
      Partial defence to murder Under s.54 and s.55 Coroners and Justice Act 2009
    • Loss of self control

      • Loss of ability to act in accordance with formal powers of reasoning
    • Jewell (2014) case for lose of control 

      • Defence failed as it was premeditated, therefore acting within normal powers of reasoning
    • Qualifying triggers

      • Fear
      • Anger-things said and done
    • Fear
      D most fear serious violence from V against themselves or another
    • Anger
      things said and done
    • Circumstances must be 

      extremely grace character and caused d to have a justified sense of being seriously wronged
    • Character
      Must have a justified sense of being seriously wronged
    • Normal person test

      A person of D's sex and age, with a normal degree of tolerance and self-restraint. case ( complin)
    • Involuntary manslaughter, UAM 

      4 areas to prove, unlawful act, dangerous, caused death, intention for the unlawful act
    • 4 areas to prove
      • Unlawful Act
      • Omissions do not count, can be aimed at a person or property
      • Manslaughter
    • Case (Larkin)
      • G of unlawful act assault was more than simple threat
    • Cases, Church

      • G of UAM when he assaulted the V, due to her tounting him
    • Goodfellow
      • G of UAM, can be aimed at property
    See similar decks