Francis Fukuyama wrote a paper for the right-leaning international relations magazine in 1989
The paper stirred such interest and caused such controversy that Fukuyama was soon contracted to expand his 18-page article into a book
The book was published in 1992 and was titled "The End of History and the Last Man"
Fukuyama's argument
The unfolding of history had revealed - even though in fits and starts - the ideal form of political organisation: liberal democratic states tied to market economies (the least-worst form)
Liberal democratic state
Requires democratic elections resulting in implementation of citizen's will
Sufficient strength and authority to enforce its laws and administer services
The state and its highest representatives are limited by the law
Fukuyama's idea
Has a debt to Hegel and others
German philosopher Georg Wilhelm Friedrich Hegel (1770-1831) created the term "the end of history"
Hegel's modern interpreters Karl Marx (1818-1883) and Alexandre Kojève (1902-1968) also discussed the end of history
Hegel (according to Kojève) had witnessed this end of history (or at least the beginning of such an end) with the French Revolution and its universalisation of the ideas of equality and liberty
For Marx, the resolution of historical development would take the form of global communism
By the end of the 1980s, Fukuyama - along with a host of others - began to suspect we weren't going to see a Marxist "end of history" after all