LESSON 5: SYMBOLIC INTERACTIONISM AND TRANSPERSONAL THEORY

Cards (12)

  • Symbolic Interaction Theory - delves into how people create and interpret the world around them. 
  • Symbolic interactionism - Its core posits that individuals interact with each other using symbols; words, gestures, and objects that have agreed-upon meanings.
  • Symbolic interactionism - According to Blumer, humans act towards things based on the meanings they assign to them, and these meanings are derived from social interactions.
  • KEY PRINCIPLES OF SYMBOLIC INTERACTIONISM
    • emphasizing the subjective meanings 
    • recognizing that social interactions are fundamental to the construction of meaning
    • acknowledging that individuals have unique perspectives and interpretation of symbols 
  • Strengths of Symbolic Interactionism
    • Applies micro-level analysis
    • Embraces individualism
    • Recognizes that reality is dynamic, not static
    • Explores social interactions, fostering collective action
  • Weaknesses of SYmbolic Interactionism
    • Lacks macro-level analysis
    • Excessive individualism may risk misinterpretation
    • Tends to overlook the significance of emotions
    • Impact of labeling
  • Transpersonal Theory - focuses on aspects of human behavior and experience that are distinctive to our nature as human beings.
  • Transpersonal theory - It heeds our highest aspirations and potential and our wants for love, meaning, creativity, and building rapport with others and the universe.
  • Maslow's hierarchy of needs theory - outlines human development from basic survival needs to self-actualization and self-transcendence.
  • THREE KINDS OF TRANSPERSONAL EXPERIENCES
    • peak experience
    • nadir experience
    • plateau experience
  • STRENGTHS
    1. Promotes enhancement on well-being
    2. Provide broad view of well-being (levels of higher consciousness and spiritualism)
    3. Emphasis on dignity and worth of the person
    4. Personal techniques and treatment process
  • Weaknesses
    1. Spiritual based process and support
    2. Pseudoscience
    3. Inconsistency on approach 
    4. Ethical Concerns