Save
Psychological Assessment
Slide 7
Save
Share
Learn
Content
Leaderboard
Learn
Created by
Sofia Salvador
Visit profile
Cards (31)
Filipino Intelligence Test
4
Major
Factors
of
Intelligence
Vocabulary
ability to deal with words
meaning used in a sentence
Analogy
perceived relationships
Numerical
Reasoning
application of basic math concepts
problem solving skills
Abstract
Reasoning
(nonverbal)
Filipino
Intelligence
Test
Purpose
and
Use
a
measure
of
mental
ability
on the
basis
of
verbal
and
non-verbal
use
filipino setting and context
to estimate aptitude and potential
Filipino Intelligence Test Setting
schools
business
and
industry
planning of
intervention
programs
educational
and
vocational
goals
Filipino Intelligence Test Measures
occupational achievement
scholastic achievement
Filipino Intelligence Test Use
16
years and older
Filipino Intelligence Test Reliability
Cronbach alpha
vocabulary =
.80
analogy =
.82
numerical ability =
.87
non-verbal ability =
.98
Filipino Intelligence Test Validity
comparison with
Culture
Fair
Test
.41 to .79
comparison with
School Grades
.31 to .69
Filipino Intelligence Test Scoring
T-scores
Crystalized Intelligence Score (CIS)
VTS + ATS + NATS
Fluid Intelligence Score (FIS)
NVTS
Generalized Intelligence Test (GIS)
CIS + FIS
Raven's Progressive Matrices
forge new insights
discern meaning in confusion
perceive and identify
relationships
generate new
nonverbal
concepts
problem-solving
ability
clear
thinking
Raven's Progressive
Matrices
eliminating language
as a barrier
for adults
schools and workplaces
Raven's Progressive Matrices
diagrammatic puzzles
5
sets,
12
problems per set
simultaneous
2
dimensions
progressing difficulty
Raven's Progressive Matrices 3 versions
colored
progressive matrices
standard
progressive matrices
SPM
2
SPM-Plus
(
1998
)
advanced
progressive
matrices
Standard Progressive Matrices
Sets A to E:
12
sets each
increasing difficulty that requires greater
cognitive capacity
all items are presented in
black
and
white
SPM-Plus
published to offer greater
discrimination
among more
able
young
adults
increasing
difficulty
Advanced
Progressive
Matrices
48
items
Set
1-12
Set
2-36
increasing
difficulty
Advanced
Progressive
Matrices
more
complex
version
assess candidates with a greater level of
cognitive
abilities
appropriate for adults and
adolescents
of above-average
intelligence
Colored
Progressive
Matrices
tests
cognitive capabilities
and
fluid intelligence
of children between the ages of
5
and
11
elderly with
declining
cognitive abilities
individuals with
physical
and
mental
impairments
Raven's Progressive Matrices Validity Studies
construct validity =
.54
to
.86
content validity =
.20
to
.80
Raven's Progressive Matrices Administration
no
time limit
work at own pace
simple, direct instructions
Thurstone
Test of
Mental Alertness
1943
first published with a
20-minute
time limit
1952
revision
126
items with 2 forms
raised
difficulty of items
Thurstone
Test of
Mental Alertness
general
mental ability
capacity to
acquire
new
knowledge
and
skills
applied in
problem-solving
ability to
respond
quickly
and
accurately
to different problem types
Thurstone
Test of
Mental Alertness
4 types of problems
arithmetic reasoning
: solving word-arithmetic problems
number series
: finding the next number in a series
same-opposite
: synonyms and antonyms of given words
definition
: marking the first letter of the word described
Thurstone Test
of
Mental Alertness
format
items in
increasing difficulty
sequence of
verbal
and
quantitative
items
Thurstone Test
of
Mental Alertness Purpose
and
Use
16 years old
and above
high school to college
business and industry (entry-level to management level)
measures
scholastic achievement
predictor of
occupational achievement
designed to be used by people familiar with the
English Language
and those who had
average
educational opportunities
Thurstone
Test of
Mental Alertness Reliability
equivalence between forms =
.74
to
.86
test-retest reliability =
.84
to
.96
L and Q Scores = .77 to .80
Thurstone Test of Mental Alertness Validity
comparison with student grades =
.4
to
.77
comparison with school achievement test scores =
.47
to
.85
comparison with job performance rating =
.4
to
.63
Thurstone
Test of
Mental Alertness Administration
can be used in big groups -
1
psychometrician per
75
examinees
generally
self-administering
time
20
mins
Thurstone
Test of
Mental Alertness
Scoring
3
percentile ranks
L
score (linguistic)
Q
score (quantitative)
total
score
15
different US
Norm
Groups
Filipino norm group
N=1045
Thurstone
Test of
Mental Alertness Meaning
of Scores in general
high
scores:
high
ability
to
solve
verbal
and
numerical
problems
and
high
speed
of
response
low
scores:
low
ability
to handle one or
both
types of problems and
difficulty
in
adjusting
from one problem
situation
to another
Interpreting the Scores
more than
95th
percentile:
intellectually superior
75
to
94.99th
percentile:
above average
25
to
74.99th
percentile:
average
5.01
to
24.99th
percentile:
below average
less than
5th
percentile:
intellectually impaired
Interpreting the Scores
intellectually superior
: remarkable, excellent intellectual functioning
above average
: good, great, more than expected intellectual functioning
average: adequate, normal for age, expected intellectual functioning
below average: barely adequate, slightly slower intellectual functioning
intellectually impaired: below the age expected functioning, extremely low level of cognitive functioning