Organisation that aims to influence political decision making
Promotional group
They promote a specific issue like housing and homelessness. These are issues that almost everyone agrees with
Normally inclusive and they can build large amounts of support
Interest Group
Designed to defend the interests of their members like trade unions
National Education Unio
Insider group
Insider groups are those than are consulted by the government so they have an inside status
They are law abiding and need a good public image to have the trust of the gov
BMA is an insider group
Outsider group
Those that are not consulted by the government and try to influence political decision making
Some outsider groups can become insider groups
They can use unconventional methods like blocking roads
SHAC is an outsider group
Case study: Insider group British medical Association
Aims - Act as a Doctor's Trade Union, improve pay and conditions
Lobby for improvements off the government for better healthcare and public health e.g. a minimum unit price for alcohol sales
BMA 2
Membership - 160,000 doctors and medical students
Methods - meetings with ministers, organising strikes by junior doctors
BMA 3
Successes - plays a leading role in every debate regarding health. Well respected. Government had implemented policies due to the BMA like an opt out system for organising donation
Failures - BMA cancelled plans for a second junior doctor strike. Government didn't give junior doctors new contracts
Case study: Outsider Group Extinction Rebellion
Aims - Making the government tell the truth by declaring a climate emergency. Forcing the government to act now. Convince the government to make a public assembly for climate change
ER 2
Membership - no hierarchy of membership. Set up in 2018 and by 2020 it had 485 groups in 70 countries with 135 in the UK
Methods - peaceful and direct action. Mass protests, blocking roads, gluing themselves to buildings. Mass arrests which are intended to fill police cells
ER 3
Successes - The environment sits on a higher political agenda higher than ever. All UK political parties have commited to making the UK carbon neutral by 2025. Select committees have set up in UK parliament the 100 member citizens assembly UK
ER 4
Failures - some of its actions were unhelpful stunts. The pace of government action isn't what ER wanted. Lack of divisions may have caused local groups to use unsuitable actions. Lost momentum during COVID and BLM taking up the political agenda
Working with the system
Influencing government - influencing ministers and civil servants through contributions
Influencing parliament - lobby MPs to influence gov bills. May lobby the HOL to improve legislation to initiate their own legislation
Influencing political parties - Unions have been part of labour since it's formation and essential in financial contribution
Using the courts - pressure groups may use judicial review to overturn gov legislation. Criminal justice and courts act 2015 removed charities from calling judicial review as they did it too much
Working outside the system
Appealing to the public - use the media for public support. Outsider groups rely on the media and do marches to attract attention
Background campaigns - long term campaigns are designed to produce shits in public opinion
Short-term campaign - these are aimed at warning the public of a serious issue and solving it
Direct action - marches, demonstrations, strikes and unusual Stunts like climbing buildings. Some is legal like trade union strikes but some isn't like blocking roads. Violence is the most extreme and was seen in the 2020 BLM riots
Factors that affect pressure group influence
Membership - large memberships often have larger influences on politicians, the public and media
Resources - Money funds, equipment, staff and advertising help pressure groups stay alive and spread messages.
Aims - Limited and easily achievable aims are more likely to be met like the Snowdrop campaign for Dunblane
Methods - direct action needs to be handled carefully as it can damage a groups image, and they aim for access points for their cause
Factors that affect pressure groups influence
Celebrity endorsement - this can bring publicity towards an issue that politicians ignore like Marcus Radford
Links with logical parties - Trade unions are important to Labour and it provides funding for the campaigns. Pressure groups can be approached for support on a new policy
Relationship with the media - most pressure groups aim to get publicity off the media particularly when carrying out direct action
Think tanks
Exist purely to develop new policies
Funded by donations by individuals, groups or businesses
Some have a clear position on the political spectrum and are usually independent of political parties but aim to convince political parties
Think tanks produce detailed reports and research which can be used by political parties
Lobbyists
Paid operatives who are meant to influence the government
They are usually employed by wealthy corporations or pressure groups
Lobbying has grown to a £2 billion industry
Cash for access scandals where politicians offer to lobby for companies for money
Corporations
May be invited by the government to contribute to policy discussions and to help produce legislation to their business
They lobby the government for favourable conditions
They threaten to leave the government if they don't meet the corporation's demands
Owners of corporations make donations to political parties
The Media
Governments are scrutinised by the media, and are keen to attract positive reports
Gov ministers have personal links with figures in the media
Support from the media can help governments win general elections like in 1997
Pluralism
Different groups, including pressure groups compete equally for power and influence which is then spread across different groups in society
Are pressure groups good for democracy
Yes - PG are an essential part of democracy and allow for different views
Allow people to focus on issues that concern them
Gives people an outlet to participate in democracy any time rather than elections
Many pressure groups have more members than political parties, suggesting they are more relevant to the public
Are pressure groups good for democracy
No - pressure groups can be undemocratic and give a louder voice to the powerful and rich which have more opportunities than lower tier pressure groups
PG often have a lack of internal democracy which can lead to leaders making decisions without the group
They focus on one issue which isn't ideal for society and government