Atkinson and Shiffrin 1968, a theoretical cognitive model of how the memory system processes information
Sensory register
1. Receives raw sense impressions
2. Attention passes info to short-term memory
3. Coding is modality specific
4. Capacity is very large
5. Duration is very short (250 milliseconds)
Short-term memory
1. Receives info from sensory register by paying attention or from long-term memory by retrieval
2. Keeps information by repeating maintenance rehearsal or passing to long-term memory
3. Coding is acoustic
4. Duration is approximately 18 seconds
5. Capacity is 7 plus/minus 2 items
Long-term memory
1. Very long duration, permanent memory storage
2. Theoretically unlimited capacity
3. Forgotten information appears to be inaccessible
4. Coded semantically in the form of meaning
5. Must be passed back to short-term memory to use the information
Recall of a random row of a 12x12 grid flashed for 120th of a second was 75%, suggesting all rows were stored in sensory register but quickly forgotten
Immediate recall was worse for acoustically similar words and recall after 20 minutes was worse for semantically similar words, suggesting short-term memory is coded acoustically and long-term memory is coded semantically
Capacity of short-term memory
Average 7 items for letters, 9 for numbers (Jacobs)
Duration of short-term memory
Less than 10% recall of a 3-letter trigram after 18 seconds with an interference task (Peterson and Peterson)
Capacity of long-term memory
75% recall of critical details after 1 year, 45% after 5 years (Wagner's diary study)
Duration of long-term memory
90% recall of school friends' names after 15 years, 80% after 48 years (Bahrick)
Cognitive tests of memory like the multistore model are often highly artificial, have low mundane realism, and are conducted in lab environments, so findings may not generalize to real-world memory use
Types of long-term memoryDeclarative (explicit, conscious)
Episodic (experiences and events)
Semantic (facts and knowledge)
Procedural (skills and habits)
Children with hippocampal damage had episodic amnesia but intact semantic memory, suggesting they use different brain regions (Vargha-Khadem)
Clive Wearing had retrogradeamnesia for episodic and semantic memories, but could gain new procedural memories through repetition, suggesting the types of long-term memory use different brain areas
Generalizing findings from idiographic case studies to explain memory in the wider population is problematic, as other unknown issues unique to the individual could explain the behaviour
Working memory model
An active processor made of multiple stores, replacing the short-term memory store in the multistore model
Central executive
Receives sense information, controls attention, and filters information before passing to subsystems
Phonological loop
Processes soundinformation, contains acoustic store and inner voice for subvocal repetition, capacity of 2seconds
Visuospatial sketchpad
Processes visual and spatialinformation, contains visual cache and inner eye
Episodic buffer
Added in 2000 to hold and combine information from the subsystems and long-term memory
Performing two visual tasks impaired performance more than a visual and verbal task, suggesting the subsystems are separate (Baddeley)
Brain injury patient KF had selective impairment to verbalshort-term memory but not visual functioning, suggesting the subsystems are separate processes in the brain (Shallice and Warrington)
More prefrontal cortex activation when integrating spatial and verbal information, suggesting the episodic buffer exists in the prefrontal cortex (Prabhakaran)
Participants could recall more monosyllabic words than polysyllabic words, suggesting the capacity of the phonologicalloop is limited by the time it takes to say the words (Baddeley)
The working memory model seems more accurate than the short-term memory component of the multistore model in describing how memory is used as an active processor
Memory tasks used in research often lack mundane realism, so findings may not generalize to real-world memory use
The central executive concept in the working memory model needs further development, and the inclusion of the episodic buffer is part of this
It is impossible to directly observe the processes described in memory models, so inferences and assumptions must be made that could be incorrect
Interference theory of forgetting
Forgetting occurs because long-term memories become confused or disrupted by other information
Proactive interference
Old information disrupts the recall of new information
Retroactive interference
New information disrupts the recall of old information
Similarity interference
Interference is morelikely when the information is similar due to response competition
Time sensitivity interference
Interference is less likely when there is a large gap between learning and retrieval
Retrieval failure due to absence of cues
Information is in long-term memory but forgotten due to lack of appropriate prompts or cues
Context-dependent cues
Aspects of the external environment act as cues to memory
State-dependent cues
Aspects of the internal environment, such as emotions or arousal, act as cues to memory
Retroactive interference
New information disrupts old information
Proactive interference
Previously learned information disrupts the learning of new information
Interference only explains forgetting when two sets of information are similar and one learned closer together in time
Context dependent cues
Aspects of our external environment that work as cues to memory, such as sight, sound, and smells