Involves the amygdala, hypothalamus, and hippocampus
What is the amygdala responsible for?
Attaching emotional significance to sensory behaviours
Damage to the prefrontal cortex reduces the inhibition of the amygdala, resulting in higher levels of aggression
Kluver and Bucy
Found that destroying the amygdala in rhesus monkeys reduced aggression
Pardin
Found that a reduced amygdala volume was positively correlated with aggression. As the amygdala evaluates the emotional importance of sensory information, a reduced volume would suggest an inability to do this, making violence more likely
Hypothalamus
Regulates the autonomic nervous system, which regulates responses to emotional circumstances. Damage to this area can result in an inappropriate aggression response to a perceived threat
Hippocampus
Forms long-term memories. Previously experienced aggression will be remembered
Boccardi et al. (2010)
Found that habitually violent offenders exhibited abnormalities in hippocampus function
Raive
Found that violent criminals had asymmetry in the size of the hippocampus within each hemisphere This impairs the ability of the hippocampus to communicated with the amygdala, leading to incorrect processing of sensory information and therefore aggression
Serotonin
Acts on frontal areas of the brain to inhibit the firing of the amygdala. Low levels leads to an inability to control impulsive and aggressive behaviour and affects response to external stimuli, meaning the person becomes aggressive easily. Can’t anticipate risk and therefore impulsively engage in aggressive behaviour
Low levels of serotonin are linked ti uncreased susceptibility to impulsive behaviour, aggression, and violent suicide
Mann et al
Gave 35 healthy participants a drug which depletes serotonin. Using a questionnaire to assess hostility and aggression levels, they found that the drug in males (but not females) was associated with an increase in hostility and aggression
What does Mann et al’s research tell us about neural explanations of aggression?
They may suffer from beta bias
Evaluate neural explanations
Research support for the role of serotonin. In research with vervet monkeys, reducing serotonin levels increased aggression whilst increasing serotonin decreased aggression
Hormonal explanations
Explanations for behaviour based on the role of hormones
Research support for testosterone
Beeman (1947) castrated male mice and found that their aggression reduced
Beeman later injected the mice with testosterone, which re-established their aggression
Castration is now used for reducing aggression in animals
Dabbs' research
Measured testosterone in saliva of 692 adult male prisoners
Found higher levels in rapists and violent offenders than burglars and thieves
Carre and Olmstead's research
Testosterone levels fluctuate in response to context
Violent crimes may be a response to environmental stimuli
Testosterone
Correlated with aggression
Ethological explanations
Explanations that seek to understand human (or animal) behavior by studying them in their natural environment
Ethological explanations
Propose that aggression evolved automatic, innate responses in animals
Believe animals have a built-in neural structure that will cause the release of automatic behavioral responses when exposed to specific stimuli (such as facial expressions)
Fixed Action Patterns (FAPs)
Occur in the same way (stereotyped)
Are present in all conspecifics (universal)
Are innate and cannot be changed
Once triggered, the behavior must be completed (ballistic)
Hydraulic model
Each FAP has a specific trigger (signstimuli) that can release a reservoir of action-specificenergy (ASE)
Once the FAP has been performed, the reservoir needs time to build up again before the FAP can be repeated
Aggression is used to establish/protect territory and hierarchy
Aggression rarely leads to death of the invader but defeats prompts the defeated individual to look for a territory further afield which is beneficial for the species
Being at the top of the hierarchy gives access to more resources and, in males, gives privileged access to females
When aggression takes place within species (intra-species), aggression is ritualised, it occurs in a series of steps carried out in a set order and end with appeasement displays from the "defeated"
Aggression is thought to be evolutionary therefore ethologists argue that we are born with physiological structures eg neural circuits, which produce aggression
Innate Releasing Mechanism (IRM)
An innate system that responds to a stimulus in the environment to produce a pre-programmedfixedactionpattern (FAP)
Fixed Action Patterns
Three-spine stickleback males attack other males with red bellies that invade their territory
Tinbergen (1951) provided evidence for the existence of FAPs in three spine sticklebacks
Lorenz
Species have instinctive inhibitions that prevent them from using weapons on their own species. E.g. if two wolves are fighting and one exposes their neck, instinctive inhibitions stop the other one from continuing the fight
Ethological explanations evaluation
Lorenz underestimated the role of the environment. Lehrman
Humans don’t have FAPs for aggression. Eibl-Eibesfeldt: smiling and eyebrow flash
Ritualised aggression in humans
Social learning theory
Social-psychological explanation of aggression
Observational learning
Learning through observing someone’s behaviour
Vicarious reinforcement
Observing someone being reinforced for a behaviour and therefore being more likely to replicate it
Vicarious punishment
Observing someone being punished for a behaviour and therefore being less likely to replicate it
Model
A person whose behaviours we want to imitate
SLT meditational processes
Attention
Retention
Motor reproduction
Motivation
Self-efficacy
The extent to which our actions will achieve a desired goal. Aggressive behaviour may lead to us getting something we want, so we’re more likely to repeat it