The systematic study of the nature of literature and of the methods for literary analysis
Formalism
Originated in Russia during the early 20th century
Spearheaded by scholars such as Roman Jakobson and Viktor Shklovsky
Gained prominence as a reaction against the prevailing literary theories of the time, particularly historical and biographical criticism
Formalism
Emphasizes the structure, form, and technical aspects of literature over its historical or authorial context
Views the literary work as an autonomous entity, independent of external factors
Structuralism
An approach to studying literature that became popular in the 1960s, influenced by the Swiss linguist Ferdinand de Saussure's examination of language as a system of signs (semiology)
Deconstruction
A theory and practice of reading which questions and claims to "subvert" or "undermine" the assumption that the system of language provides grounds that are adequate to establish the boundaries, the coherence or unity, and the determinate meanings of the literary text
Sign
A linguistic experience consisting of a signifier (the word or group of words) and a signified (the concept or meaning associated with that signifier)
Formalism
Has the advantage of forcing writers to evaluate a work on its own terms rather than to rely on "accepted" notions of the writer's work
Works best when applied to poetry and short fiction
Attempts to discover meaning by close reading of a work of literature
Deconstruction
According to Derrida, all texts, whether they are literary, philosophical, or scientific, are constructed out of language, and language is inherently unstable, and open to all multiple interpretations
Structuralists
Believe that if readers do not understand the signs, they may misinterpret or misread a text
Do not focus on the overall meaning of a text, but rather on the linguistic structure of a text
Focus of Formalism
Form, organization, and structure
Word choice and language
Multiple meanings
Formalism
An approach that analyses, interprets and evaluates the inherent features of a text, including grammar, syntax and literary devices, reducing the importance of a text's historical, biographical, and cultural context
Deconstruction is not a dismantling of the structure of a text, but a demonstration that it has already dismantled itself. Its apparently-solid ground is no rock, but thin air
Structuralism attempts to classify all elements of the text at their different linguistic levels: phonemes, morphemes, lexical categories, noun phrases, verb phrases, and sentence types
Formalism/New Criticism
Meaning resides in the text—not in reader, author, or world
Texts may contain numerous messages, but must have a unifying central theme created by the perfect union of all artistic elements
The methodology for finding meaning is clear-cut; the tools are unique to literary analysis. Close reading is the basis of new critical
Literary criticism
The study, discussion, evaluation, and interpretation of literature
Deconstruction
Cannot be defined in particular terms
Breaking down the conventional obviousness of the structures
Contradiction in meaning
Readers psyche modifies the meaning
Not one meaning but many opposite meanings
The idea of a unified, singular, final meaning is a myth
Structuralism recognises that the significance of each word within a text is determined by internal as well as external factors; i.e. historical, biographical and cultural contexts
Literariness
Formalists assert that literature possesses unique qualities that distinguish it from other forms of discourse
They focus on what makes a text literary, such as language, style, and narrative techniques
Deconstruction
No true meaning due to ambiguity of language
Meaning is based on a combination of intent and context
Defamiliarization
A central concept in Formalism, refers to the process of making the familiar seem unfamiliar or strange
By disrupting habitual perception, literature enables readers to see the world in a new light
Deconstruction
Looks at the ambiguities in signifiers and states that there can be many different signified meanings for a single signifier
Close Reading
Formalist analysis prioritizes close examination of the text itself, rather than extraneous information
It involves analyzing the linguistic, structural, and stylistic elements to uncover deeper meanings and patterns
Deconstruction theory
Emphasizes binary oppositions or two concepts that are the antithesis of each other
We only know what hot is because we felt cold (and vice versa)
Narrative Structure (plot, point of view, narrative voice)
Rhetorical Strategies (patterns of repetition, word choice, syntactical arrangement)
How to deconstruct
1. Select a text to be deconstructed
2. Determine what the text says
3. Identify the binary opposites that exist in the text
4. Analyze why the text claims one opposite as superior to the other
5. Derive a new meaning by flipping the binaries around
Formalism's emphasis on the text's formal qualities has been both praised and criticized
While Formalism offers valuable insights into the aesthetic dimension of literature, some critics argue that it neglects broader socio-political contexts and historical influences
Literary criticism
Evaluation of literary works, including classification by genre, analysis of structure, and judgement of value
Asking what literature is, what it does, and what it is worth
The method used to interpret any given work of literature
Critics also contend that Formalism can be overly reductive, focusing exclusively on the text's formal features while overlooking its cultural, ideological, and biographical dimensions
Deconstruction sets out to show that conflicting forces within the text itself serve to dissipate the seeming definiteness of its structure and meanings into an indefinite array of incompatible and undecidable possibilities
Despite its critics, Formalism continues to influence literary criticism and theory today
Strengths of deconstruction criticism
Ability to challenge dominant interpretations and reveal hidden or suppressed meanings in the text
Bringing light to other perspectives and meanings that may have been overlooked
Helps us realize that there is no "obvious" link between words and meaning
Brings what is normally marginalized to the forefront
Formalist principles have been adapted and integrated into various interdisciplinary fields, including film studies, art criticism, and cultural analysis
Weaknesses of deconstruction criticism
Undermines the assumed ability of people to communicate and understand each other effectively
It is way too hard, can be difficult to understand and apply
Though it does analyze language very closely, the results are rather openminded
Formalism offers a valuable perspective on literature by foregrounding its formal properties and aesthetic dimensions
By examining the text in isolation from external contexts, Formalism invites readers to engage deeply with the intricacies of language, structure, and style
It is essential to recognize the limitations of Formalism and supplement it with other critical perspectives to gain a comprehensive understanding of literary works
The different schools of literary criticism provide us with lenses which ultimately reveal important aspects of the literary work
Psychoanalytic Criticism
Literary criticism influenced by the tradition of psychoanalysis begun by Sigmund Freud
Psychoanalytic literary criticism
Views works through the lens of psychology
Looks at psychological motivations of characters or authors