Views the education system as performing a range of key roles for society that are beneficial and necessary for a society to perform effectively
Emile Durkheim
Founder of functionalist sociology
Saw the main function of education as the transmission of society's norms and values to individuals
Argued that schools prepare us for the wider society where we have to cooperate with people who are neither family nor friends
Believed that one function of an education system was to provide specialist skills needed for cooperation in complex industrial societies
Durkheim believed that punishments should reflect the seriousness of the damage done to the wider social group or society
Durkheim's ideas about the importance of history in creating social solidarity
Learning the history of a country could have the opposite effect
Criticisms of Durkheim
Assumes there is a shared culture that can be transmitted through education and the hidden curriculum, which may not be the case in a multicultural society
The education system may not adequately teach specialised skills useful in the workplace
The culture being transmitted may benefit the ruling class and not society as a whole
The culture being transmitted is patriarchal or male dominated
Assumes students will come to accept the values of society that are being taught, which may not be the case for all students
Talcott Parsons
Argued that schools prepare children for entry into the wider society by treating everyone according to the same universalistic standards, unlike the particularistic standards of the family
Believed that schools promote the importance of achievement and the value of equality of opportunity
Saw the education system as a meritocracy where status is based on merit alone
Argued that the education system is an effective device for sorting people out so that they are matched to the correct job for their abilities
Criticisms of Parsons
Does not fully consider whose values are being transmitted via the education system
Questioned the idea that the education system is meritocratic
Role allocation has been criticised as those with the best qualifications don't always get the top jobs
Marxist view of education
See it as a form of social control that creates obedient and passive workers for the capitalist economy, teaching ruling-class values rather than shared values
Argue that education reproduces the existing social class structure by ensuring working-class students are less likely to achieve good qualifications
Bowles and Gintis
See the key role of the education system as creating and reproducing a workforce with the correct characteristics to meet the needs of the capitalist economy, such as being hard working, disciplined, submissive, and obedient
Argue that there is a close link, or correspondence, between the relationships and interactions expected and valued in schools and those expected and valued in the workplace
Reject the idea that the education system is meritocratic, arguing that social class background, not intelligence or achievement, is the main factor affecting income
Bowles and Gintis are accused of taking a deterministic view, assuming students have no free will and passively accept the values taught via the hidden curriculum
Modern economies and businesses can be seen as requiring a different kind of workforce to the one Bowles and Gintis describe, with a need for creative and independent workers capable of taking on responsibility and developing new ideas
The Butler Education Act was introduced in Britain
1944
Aims of the 1944 Butler Education Act
To give all students an equal chance to develop their talents and abilities in a system of free, state-run education
To introduce a meritocratic system where children would receive an education based on their ability and not their social class
The 1944 Act introduced a tripartite system of secondary education with grammar schools, secondary modern schools, and technical schools
The 1944 Act also introduced free secondary education for all children up to the age of 15
Comprehensive system of secondary education introduced in Britain
1965
Comprehensive system
Aimed to provide a common curriculum and equal opportunities for all children, regardless of their ability or social background
Abolished the tripartite system and the 11+ exam that determined which type of secondary school a child would attend
The comprehensive system was introduced to address concerns about the 11+ exam and the tripartite system reinforcing social class divisions
The Education Reform Act was introduced in Britain
1988
Education Reform Act
Introduced a National Curriculum with compulsory core and foundation subjects
Introduced national testing at ages 7, 11, 14 and 16
Gave parents more choice over which school their child attended
The Education Reform Act aimed to raise standards and improve accountability in the education system
Correspondence principle
Marxists such as Bowles and Gintis identify how the hidden curriculum prepares students for entry into the workforce with the correct values
Meritocracy
Can be seen as a myth
The 1944 Education Act aimed to give all students an equal chance to develop their talents and abilities in a system of free, state-run education
Tripartite system
Children's ability was tested at the age of 11 years by the 11-plus exam. Based on the results, children went to one of three types of school: secondary modern, secondary technical, or grammar
The 11-plus exam still exists in some areas of the country where grammar schools still exist, and much of the private sector uses entry tests
In 1965, the then Labour government asked Local Education Authorities (LEAs) to reorganise secondary education so that all students, regardless of academic ability, attended the same type of school - a 'comprehensive' school
Comprehensive schools
Social reasons: break down social barriers
Educational reasons: cater for children of all abilities, no entrance exam or selection
Geographical reasons: each school has a specific catchment area
Comprehensives are not really of mixed social class, as they are based on a local neighbourhood - for example, inner-city comprehensives are usually working class and suburban ones are usually middle class
Some argue that most comprehensives are not really comprehensive at all because, for instance, they stream or band students within the school according to ability
Pre-school education refers to the care and education of children under the age of 5 years, and may take the form of day nurseries, playgroups, or nursery education
Primary education refers to infant and junior schools, which are usually co-educational and take students from age 5 to 11 years
Secondary education refers to schools that take students from the ages of 11 to 16 years, although many may also provide sixth form education up to the age of 18
Further and higher education refers to education outside schools, beyond the compulsory age of 16 years
The independent sector refers to schools that charge fees, including private schools and public schools
Around 7 per cent of all schoolchildren attend independent schools
Ex-independent school pupils made up around 40 per cent of accepted places at Oxford University in 2016, even though only around 7 per cent of all children are educated at independent schools
Advantages of independent schools
Lower teacher-student ratio, better resources and facilities, academic culture, highly motivated students, parental input, boarding school benefits
Advantages of state schools
Free, more socially mixed, route of upward social mobility, local provision
61 per cent of top doctors were educated at independent schools with only 16 per cent educated at comprehensives