Save
MC 4 LOGIC
Save
Share
Learn
Content
Leaderboard
Learn
Created by
InsipidLeopard7222
Visit profile
Cards (41)
SECOND ACT OF MIND
JUDGEMENT
PRODUCT OF JUDGEMENT
PROPOSITION
DIFFERENT RELATIONS between proportions
LOGICAL OPPOSITION
Not constituent of proposition
PROPOSITION
Copula similar in a a proposition
linking verb
applies distributely to each individual
universal
relation between two particular proposition
sub-contrary
main function of copula
to
link
the subject and predicate
equivalence of proposition process of expressing
changing
not all sincere are saved. some sincere are not saved
obversion
four kinds of equivalence:
obversion,
conversion
, contraposition,
inversion
expressing preposition without changing its original meaning
equivalence of
proposition
main idea behind logical equivalence of proposition
they share the same
truth value
in all scenarios
convertend
:
no
student cheats
no cheater
is a student
some seminarian are pious. therefore..
partial conversion
immediate inference (negative equivalent)
obversion
partial inverse of e-proposition
obvert
obverting outcome of partial contraposition
full contraposition
swapping the subject
full contraposition
another name for partial conversion
accidental conversion
resultant inference in
contraposition
contraposit
two kinds of contraposit:
partial
and
complete
symbols four types of logical opposition:
A,E,I,O
PREDICATE IN CATEGORICAL PROPOSITION: no roses are blue?
BLUE
nature of subject:
predicate
number of individuals
:
quantity
purpose forming judgement:
to
initiate actions
type of proposition between A and O?
contradictory
relation exists between two particular proposition
sub-contrary
reasoning concerns
argument
before evaluating validity
the general rules governing valid reasoning in
logic
non-argument e.g:
i believe that the green is the best
color
an argument is considered to be sound if it is:
valid
proposition in categorical manner:
categorical syllogism
statement asserts particular member:
minor premise
errors in logical structure:
formal fallacies
antecedent and consequent are negated:
denying the
antecedent
statement with disjunct:
affirming
disjunct
fallacy suggest assumption, one must be true:
denying conjunct
categorical syllogism: how many
term
?
THRICE
See all 41 cards