animal studies of attachment

    Cards (11)

    • outline Lorenz research into imprinting
      randomly divided clutch of goose eggs into 2 conditions:
      1. hatched with mother goose in natural environment
      2. hatched in incubator and first moving object they saw was Lorenz
    • results of Lorenz research into imprinting
      • experimental group followed Lorenz everywhere
      • control group followed mother goose everywhere
      • when the 2 groups were mixed up = control went to mother and experimental went to Lorenz
      • identified a critical period = imprinting needs to take place within a certain time otherwise no attachment is formed
    • define imprinting
      process in birds where they attach to the first thing they see upon hatching
    • outline sexual imprinting case study
      • in a zoo, a peacock hatched in the reptile house
      • first thing it saw were giant tortoises
      • therefore as an adult, it only directed mating towards giant tortoises
    • evaluate Lorenz research into imprinting (STRENGTHS)
      • research support by Regolin and Vallortigara.
      • chicks exposed to a moving shape combination
      • then a range of moving shape combinations moved infront of them
      • found that they followed the original most closely
      • Supports the view that young animals are born with the instinct to imprint during the critical period as Lorenz suggested.
    • evaluate Lorenz research into imprinting (LIMITS)
      lacks ability to generalise to humans = mammalian attachment system is different and more complex
    • outline Harlow research into contact comfort
      • 16 baby monkeys and 2 wire mothers
      • condition 1 = plain wire mother dispensed milk
      • condition 2 = cloth covered, heated wire mother dispensed milk
    • results of Harlow research into contact comfort
      • monkeys cuddled cloth mother more than wire mother regardless of which dispensed milk
      • sought comfort from cloth mother when frightened with a noisy mechanical bear
    • conclusions of Harlow research into contact comfort
      • suggested contact comfort is more important than food in attachment behaviour.
      • when monkeys were frightened with the bear, they were less scared with cloth mother than on their own and willing to explore = secure base behaviour.
      • suggested a critical period of 90 days = after this, it is impossible for attachment to form and damage is irreversible
      • long term effects = Harlow found that in adulthood, monkeys were aggressive and neglectful to their young due to maternal deprivation
    • evaluate Harlow research into contact comfort (STRENGTHS)
      real world applications
      • help social workers understand that lack of attachment is a risk for child development = allows them to intervene and prevent poor outcomes.
      • helps zoos / breeding programmes understand the importance of attachment figures
    • evaluate Harlow research into contact comfort (LIMITS)
      • lacks ability to generalise to humans = human brain and behaviour is more complex
      • ethical issues = long term damage caused to monkeys