It represents who we are. It is meaningful to us and human beings attached meaningful progenies because it is suppose to designate us to the world
Name
These men endeavored to finally locate art explanation about the nature of change, the seeming permanence despite change, and the unity of the world amidst its diverdity
Poet-theologians like Homer and Hesiod
Pre-Socratics
Greek thinkers before Socrates who were concerned with the primary substratum, arche that explains the multiplicity of things in the world
Pre-Socratic thinkers
Thales
Pythagoras
Parmenides
Heraclitus
Empedocles
The Pre-Socratics were concerned with explaining what the world is really made up of, why the world is so, and what explains the changes that they observed around them
The Pre-Socratics were tired of simply conceding to mythological accounts propounded by poet-theologians like Homer and Hesiod
Socrates was more concerned with the problem of the self, and believed the true task of the philosopher is to know oneself
Socrates: 'The unexamined life is not worth living'
During his trial, Socrates declared that his being indicted was brought about by his going around Athens engaging men, young and old, to question their presuppositions about themselves and about the world, particularly about who they are
Socrates thought that the worst that can happen to anyone is to live but die inside
Socrates's view of the human person
Every man is composed of body and soul
The body is imperfect and impermanent
The soul is perfect and permanent
Plato's view of the human person
Man is a dual nature of body and soul
The soul has three components: rational, spirited, and appetitive
Justice in the human person can only be attained if the three parts of the soul are working harmoniously
Augustine's view of the human person
Man has an aspect that dwells in the world and is imperfect, and another aspect that is capable of reaching immortality and communion with God
Aquinas's view of the human person
Man is composed of matter (body) and form (soul)
The soul is what animates the body and makes us human
Descartes's view of the human person
The human person has a body and a mind (cogito)
The mind is the essence of the human person, not the body
Hume's view of the human person
The self is nothing but a bundle of impressions and ideas
There is no unified, coherent self or soul
Kant's view of the human person
The mind organizes the impressions from the external world
The self is an actively engaged intelligence that synthesizes knowledge and experience
Ryle's view of the human person
The self is not an internal, non-physical entity, but simply the convenient name for the behaviors a person manifests
Merleau-Ponty's view of the human person
The mind and body are so intertwined that they cannot be separated
All experience is embodied, and the body is the opening to one's existence in the world
Self
Debated, discussed, and conceptualized by different thinkers in philosophy
With the advent of the social sciences, new ways and paradigms emerged to reexamine the true nature of the self</b>
Thinkers eventually got tired of focusing on the long-standing debate since sixth century BC between the relationship of body and soul/mind
Thinkers settled on the idea that there are two components of the human person and whatever relationship these two have is less important than the fact that there is a self
Given the new ways of knowing and the growth of the social sciences, it became possible for new approaches to the examination of the self to come to the fore
Relationship between the self and the external world
One of the most important axes of analysis
Tarzan story challenges the long-standing notion of human persons being special and being a particular kind of being in the spectrum of living entities
Our selves are not special because of the soul infused into us, but our growth and development and consequentially, our selves are truly products of our interaction with external reality
Self
Separate, self-contained, independent, consistent, unitary, and private
The self being private suggests that the self is isolated from the external world, but this potential clash between the self and the external reality is the reason for the self to have a clear understanding of what it might be, what it can be, and what it will be
Social constructionist perspective
The self is always at the mercy of external circumstances that bump and collide with it, ever-changing and dynamic, allowing external influences to take part in its shaping
The self should not be seen as a static entity that stays constant through and through, but rather something that is in unceasing flux, in a constant struggle with external reality and is malleable in its dealings with society
The self is always in participation with social life and its identity subjected to influences
The self is truly multifaceted
Jon, the math professor
Behaves differently in different social situations (university, home, church)
Personne and moi
Personne refers to the social concepts of what it means to be who he is, while moi refers to a person's sense of who he is, his body, and his basic identity, his biological givenness
The self has the capacity for different personne to adapt to social situations, while retaining its moi - the stable and static part of the self
Overseas Filipino worker (OFW) adjusting to life in another country
Behaves differently in the Philippines vs. in a country with strict traffic rules
The self simply morphs according to the circumstances and contexts
Filipinos' view of their territory as part of who they are
Leads to crossing roads wherever and whenever in the Philippines, but following rules in a foreign country
Language
Reflects and shapes culture, which in turn affects how one regards oneself