Involves what a neighbourhood looks like and how it is designed
Crime Prevention Through Environmental Design (CPTED)
A theory developed by Jeffrey, based on the idea that crime results from the opportunities presented by the physical environment – therefore, we should be able to alter the environment so crime is less able to occur
Towns and cities should consist of strong lighting, low level bushes, shrubbery and fences
Defensible space
Areas where there are clear boundaries so it is obvious who has the right to be there. They have low crime rates because of four key features: territoriality, surveillance, a safe image, a protected location
Indefensible space
Areas where crime is more likely to occur, in 'confused' areas of public space. They belong to no-one, are cared for by no-one and are observed by no-one
Territoriality
The environment encourages a sense of ownership among residents – the feeling that it is their territory and they control it
Natural surveillance
Features of buildings such as easily viewed entrance lobbies and street level windows allow residents to identify and observe strangers
Safe image
Building designs should give the impression of a safe neighbourhood where residents look after each other
Safe location
Neighbourhoods located in the middle of a wider crime free area are insulated from the outside world by a 'moat' of safety
Newman found that 55% of all the crimes committed occurred in public spaces such as hallways, lifts, stairwells and lobbies, because no one felt as though they 'owned' them
Damilola Taylor was killed in a concrete stairwell in a condemned housing estate
Coleman concluded that the poor design of many blocks produced higher rates of crime and antisocial behaviour, and found that three design features encouraged crime: anonymity, lack of surveillance and easy escape
On the Lisson Green estate in West London, the removal of overhead walkways led to a 50% reduction in crime
Home Office research found a 30% lower burglary rate in Secured by Design houses
Gated Lanes
Lockable gates installed to prevent offenders from gaining access to alleyways, used to prevent burglaries, fly tipping, antisocial behaviour, dog fouling, and create a safe space for children to play
Gated lanes provide a physical barrier, increase guardianship and surveillance, increase residents' sense of territoriality, and suggest the space is cared about and does not tolerate crime
The average cost of gated lanes was £728 per gate and the average benefit was over twice that cost (£2.19 for every £1 spent)
Limitations of Gated Lanes
They do not work against criminals who live in the gated area
In neighbourhoods where the residents don't know or trust each other, they may be less likely to get together to install gates, or may not take responsibility for them
There may be difficulties installing gates if the area is a public right of way, or if it has several owners who all need to agree
Can restrict access for emergency services and refuse collectors
Panopticon prison design
The building has a tower at the centre, from which it is possible to see each cell in which a prisoner is kept. Prisoners can be seen but cannot communicate with the prison officers or other prisoners. The design ensures a sense of permanent visibility that ensures the functioning of power
Surveillance theory
In today's society, self-surveillance has become an important way of achieving social control. We know we might be being watched – for example, by CCTV cameras – so we monitor and control our behaviour ourselves
Supermax prisons are the most secure levels of custody, with the objective of providing long-term, segregated housing for prisoners who represent the highest security risks
HMP Berwyn in the UK is the country's biggest prison, holding 2106 prisoners, with the accommodation divided into smaller units for easier management of the inmates
The UK government has promised to increase prison building, with a commitment of £4 billion to build a total of 18,000 prison places
Bastøy prison in Norway
A 'human ecological prison' where prisoners live in houses that are set in a self-sustaining village, rather than cells. This left realist approach produces a very low re-offending rate of 20% compared to 60% in the UK
Antisocial Behaviour Orders (ASBOs)
Civil orders introduced in 1998 to deal with low level anti-social behaviour, where breaching the order was a criminal offence punishable by up to 5 years in prison
58% of people issued with ASBOs between 2000 and 2013 breached their conditions, and over 10,000 orders were breached repeatedly
Labelling theory
Labelling a person as a criminal or deviant could lead to a self-fulfilling prophecy, where the individual internalises the label as part of their identity and begins to live up to it
Criminal Behaviour Orders (CBOs)
Introduced in 2014 to deal with seriously anti-social individuals, with both negative requirements (forbidding certain actions) and positive requirements (requiring certain actions)
Breaching a CBO can mean up to 5 years in prison for adults or two years detention for under 18s
Labelling theorists
Suggest ASBOs become a badge of honour for some young offenders, reinforcing, rather than reducing their offending behaviour and leading to repeat offending
Criminal Behaviour Orders (CBOs)
Replaced ASBOs as a result of criticisms, deal with seriously anti-social individuals who cause harassment, alarm or distress to others
Injunctions
Aim to deal with low level nuisance and annoyance, Breaching an injunction can mean up to two years in prison for adults or a three-month detention order for under-18s
Criminal Behaviour Orders (CBOs)
Last for two years at least for adults and one to two years for under 18s, Breaching a CBO can mean up to 5 years in prison for adults or two years detention for under 18s, Have both negative and positive requirements
Negative Requirements
Forbid a person from doing something, such as going to certain places, seeing certain people or engaging in certain activities
Positive Requirements
Require a person to do something positive to improve their behaviour, e.g. join a drug treatment programme
Token economy
Aims to achieve social control by rewarding desirable behaviours with tokens that can be exchanged for rewards
Desirable behaviours in a token economy
Obeying the rules
Interacting positively with staff and other inmates
Staying drug free
Engaging in 'purposeful activity'
Incentives and Earned Privileges (IEPs)
Rewards in UK prisons for desirable behaviour in a token economy
Token economies work while inmates are in the institution, but when the reinforcement stops, the desired behaviours disappear
Token economy programmes make prisoners more manageable while in prison, but there is a risk that their behaviour is being modified to suit the institution rather than to meet their rehabilitation needs