What are the factors that affect conformity in Asch's study?
size of the majority (up to seven in Asch's study)
Presence of a dissenter
public or private nature of responses
task difficulty
What did presence of a dissenter drop conformity rates to?
Near zero
The more people in the majority the more likely an individual is to conform.
What is the name given to a person who works for the researcher and is aware of the experiment but acts as a participant in order to manipulate a social situation as part of the research design?
confederate
What are the cons to Asch's study?
Artificial situation
Deception
What were the pros to Asch's study?
Lab setting provided controlled variables so high repeatability.
Influences of extraneous variables could be minimised.
How did confidence effect Asch's study?
found that participants who had not conformed all displayed confidence
did not succumb to group pressure as easily.
Other researchers carried out Asch's experiment on engineers and conformity rates were not as high. Showing confidence in decision making.
Gender - researchers found men and woman show different levels of conformity due to social roles.
Men less likely to conform due to expected to show independence and assertiveness.
What percentage of participants conformed to group pressure at least once in Asch's study?
75%
What is normative social influence?
People conform to the group norm to fit in, to feel good, and to be accepted by the group.
In Asch's (1951) line judgement task, participants complied to fit in and avoid ridicule, an instance of normative social influence.
What is informational social influence?
People conform because they believe the group is competent and has the correct information, particularly when the task or situation is ambiguous.
What is a social role?
A social role is a pattern of behaviour that is expected of a person in a given setting or group
What is a social norm?
A social norm is a group’s expectation of what is appropriate and acceptable behaviour for its members
Signs of conforming to social roles (Zimbardo)
prisoners revolted and guards threatened with night sticks.
guards harassed prisoners with lack of privacy, lack of basic comforts, degrading chores.
prisoners had severe anxiety and hopelessness
zimbardo began acting as if prison was real.
The guards and prisoners enacted their social roles by engaging in behaviours appropriate to the roles.
Social norms require guards to be authoritarian and prisoners to be submissive. When prisoners rebelled, they violated these social norms, which led to upheaval.
How many days did the stanford prison experiment end after?
6
What was the orlando study?
Mock psychiatric ward.
Conclusions from orlando's study =
mock patients began acting like normalhospital patients.
lots of patients showed signs of havign withdrawal and depression
6 patients tried to escape
How many days was the mock psychiatric ward study?
3 days
Analysis of orlandos study?
This study gives insight into real patients experiences in hospital. It also had influence in getting hospital staff to empathise more with patients.
What did milgrams study investigate?
Obedience
What is obedience?
Obedience is the change of an individual’s behaviour to comply with a demand by an authority figure.
What percentage of participants continued to maximum shock?
65% of the participants continued the shock to the maximum voltage and to the point that the learner became unresponsive.
What was the percentage of obedience when setting of experiment was moved to an office?
48%
When the researcher gave orders by phone, rate dropped to?
23%
Pros of milgram's experiment:
strict control of variables so should be able to establish cause and effect.
Cons of milgram's experiment?
low ecological validity - artificial situation
deception - no informed consent
lack of protection - visible stress
potential low internal validity
What is the agentic state?
State in which an individual behaves as the agent of another person, allowing them to deny responsibility for their actions.
What is autonomous state?
When people have control and act according to their own wishes.
What research was found that supported the agentic state in milgram's study?
In Milgram's (1963) famous study on obedience, he noted that during de-brief, participants admitted to feeling under ‘moral strain’, but still continued to obey. This is consistent with an agentic state.
How did Milgram's research support the autonomous state?
He also found that when the researchers were not in the same room as the teachers and gave instructions via a telephone, obedience fell from 62.5% to 20.4%. This is consistent with an autonomous state.
People who are obedient accept the power and status of legitimate authority figures to give orders.
What is agentic shift?
When individuals shift from the autonomous to agentic state.
Participants in Milgram's (1963) study started the experiment in the autonomous state but shifted into the agentic state when they started taking orders.
What factors did milgram think caused his participants to stay in the agentic state?
Insistence of authority
pressure of location
unwillingness to disrupt
What are the three main things about the environment that can make obedience likely:
proximity
location
uniforms
How did Milgram's study show evidence for proximity?
Milgram found that when the teacher and the learner were in the same room, and the teacher could see the learners’ distress, obedience levels dropped to 40%.
How did Milgram's study show evidence for location?
When Milgram carried out his study at the prestigious Yale University, obedience levels were higher than when he moved the experiment to an office block in a run-down part of town (62.5% to 47.5%).
How did Milgram's study show evidence that uniforms influenced obedience?