Psychologists create hypotheses and test them using studies
Uses genuine scientific methods like tightly controlled and standardized experiments that can be replicated to check for reliability
Psychology may not meet all of the requirements of a science
Studying complex human behavior is challenging and may lack objectivity
As soon as people know they are being studied they alter their behaviour
Much of the subject matter for psychology (e.g. emotions and opinions) cannot be directlyobserved, so we have to infer what people are thinking
There are many examples in psychology of methods, such as qualitative approaches and theories, which are clearly notscientific
The scientific method involves making observations, forming hypotheses, testing those hypotheses through experiments or other research methods, analyzing data, drawing conclusions, and communicating findings.
not a science - lack of falsification (AO1)
must be falsifiable / theories must be proven to be false
just because a theory cannot be falsified, doesn’t mean it must be true
no theory is completely correct
if it can be falsified and supported, it can be accepted as truth
freud - falsification (AO3)
id/ego/superego - though they seem reasonable cannot be proven to exist
freud says unbalanced id/ego/superego results in disorders like anxiety/aggression
they cannot be measured/observed directly so is unfalsifiable
casestudies - falsification - counter (AO3)
case studies on brain damaged patients can be useful in falsifying theories of memory
e.g. Clive Wearing - does not remember he was a musician (episodic) but remembers how to play the piano (procedural)
shows that there are more than 2 LTM stores than Tulving suggests - making his theory insufficient
is a science - empiricism (AO1)
data has to be directly observable
so that it can be recorded and analysed
involves use of scientific methods like experiments (deliberate manipulation of IV and direct observation of DV)
raine - empiricism (AO3)
use of brainscans (PET) to investigate brain abnormalities in murderers compared to controls
he was able to observeactive brain areas and draw the conclusion that NGRI patients have brain abnormalities
sherif - empiricism - counter (AO3)
used self-reportquestionnaires to investigate the boys’ feelings/opinions on the outgroup
this is less empirical as it is not easy to directly observe the boys’ feelings/attitudes using self report
is not a science - lack of objectivity (AO1)
must have a highlevel of objectivity
difficult to achieve when using non-experimental techniques
e.g. observation, self-report techniques, case studies.
rosenhan - objectivity (AO3)
used observation to investigate whether clinical professionals can distinguish between those who are genuinely mentally ill and not
observation relies on subjective interpretation of behaviour
reduces objectivity
loftus & palmer - objectivity - counter (AO3)
use of quantitative data analysis (chi-squared test)
came up with percentages
e.g. 32% in ‘smashed’ condition reported seeing broken glass compared to 14% in the ‘hit’ group
increases objectivity
is a science - replicability (AO1)
easy to replicate if lab/field experiments are used in a study
increases likelihood of study being reliable
baddeley - replicability (AO3)
use of standardised procedure
e.g. same set of 10 words for each participant in the condition (accoustically or semantically similar/dissimilar)
e.g. shown the words for the same amount of time of three seconds
increases reliability
case studies - replicability - counter (AO3)
the complexities of case studies make them hard to replicate