Employment law

    Cards (9)

    • Ready Mixed Concrete (SE) Ltd v MPNI
      Distinguishing between self employed and employee - multiple test - concrete truck driver - employee
    • Lee v Chung 1990

      Person performing the service as a reason in business of his own account
    • Carmichael v National Power
      Mutuality of obligation test- obligation of employer to provide work and obligation of employee to accept work. Workers would engage when required to be guides.
    • Mersey Docks & Harbour Board v Coggins & Griffiths (Liverpool) Ltd

      Secondment - crane driver injured, which employer was liable original or seconded
    • Employee:
      contract of service
      Pays tax under PAYE,
      Has legal protection
      Torts committed while employed wil be liable by employer
      Not vat registered
    • Independent Contractor (se):
      contract for service
      Self employed
      Works for many people
      Pays tax under self assessment
      They are liable for their own torts
      Limited protection
    • Tests:
      • Control - boss had control on what work was done and how
      • Multiple test:
      Worker provides his own work and skill in return for a wage or other payment
      Worker agrees that he will be under the control of the person paying for his work
      Rest of the terms of the contract are consistent with a contract of employment on matters of tax, NI and equipment provision.
    • Control & other matters such as
      • Who provided the equipment
      • Who hired those who helped the service performer
      • Amount of financial risk taken
      • Responsibility of investment and management
      • The extent to which the worker had an opportunity to profit from performing a service well
    • mutuality of obligation test: (case: Carmichael v National Power )
      obligation of employer to provide work and obligation of employee to accept work.
      Secondment: (case: Mersey Docks & Harbour Board v Coggins & Griffiths (Liverpool) Ltd
      Employer who lent the employee retains liability but it can be the other (seconded) if the borrowing employer had sufficient control of the employee
    See similar decks