Romanian orphan studies - institutionalisation

    Cards (14)

    • Orphan studies
      Studies concerned with children placed in care because their parents can't look after them
    • Institutionalization
      The effects of living in an institutional setting where there is often little emotional care provided
    • Why was there so many orphans in Romania in the 1990s?
      The former Romanian president required Romanian women to have 5 children - many parents couldn't afford to keep their children so they had to send them to huge orphanages with very poor conditions
    • When did many of the orphans get adopted?
      After the Romanian revolution in 1989
    • 2 important institutionalization researchers
      Rutter et al and Zeanah et al
    • Aim of Rutter's research
      Followed a group of 165 Romanian orphans for many years as part of the English and Romanian Adoptee (ERA) study to investigate the extent to which good care could make up for poor early experiences in institutions - orphans were adopted by families in the UK
    • Procedure of Rutter's research
      Physical, cognitive, and emotional development was assessed at ages 4, 6, 11, 15, and 22-25 years
      As a control group, 52 UK children were adopted around the same time
    • Findings of Rutter's research
      When they first arrived, half showed signs of delayed intellectual development and the majority were severely undernourished
      Aged 11, children showed differential rates of recovery related to age of adoption - mean IQ before the age of 6 months was 102, 6 months to 2 years was 86, and over 2 years was 77, and these differences remained at age 16
      ADHD was more common in ages 15 and 22-25 (Kennedy et al)
      Children adopted after 6 months showed signs of disinhibited attachment, but those adopted before 6 months rarely did
    • Signs of disinhibited attachment
      Attention-seeking, clinginess, and social behavior directed towards both familiar and unfamiliar adults
    • Procedure of Zeanah's research
      The Bucharest Early Intervention (BEI) project assessed attachment in 95 Romanian children aged 12-31 months who spent around 90% of their lives in institutional care
      Compared to a control group of 50 children who never lived in an institution
      Attachment type was measured using the Strange Situation and carers were asked about unusual social behavior
    • Findings of Zeanah's research
      74% of the control group were classed as securely attached, compared to only 19% of the institutional group
      44% of the orphans displayed disinhibited attachment, compared to under 20% controls
    • 2 effects of institutionalization
      Disinhibited attachment and intellectual disability
    • Disinhibited attachment
      Being equally friendly and affectionate to familiar and unfamiliar people - highly unusual as most children aged over 2 years show stranger anxiety
      Rutter explained disinhibited attachment as an adaptation to living with multiple caregivers during the sensitive period
      In poor quality institutions, a child could have 50 carers but won't spend enough time with one of them to form a secure attachment
    • Intellectual disability
      Most children in Rutter's study arrived in Britain with some signs of intellectual disability, but most of those adopted before 6 months old caught up with the control group by 4 years old
      Damage to intellectual development due to institutionalization can be recovered if adoption takes place before 6 months of age - when attachments form
    See similar decks