What test whether the experiment is measuring what it's supposed to
An invalid test can be reliable
An unreliable test cannot be valid because it isn't measuring anything
SAT
Standardized - compared to a representative sample to understand what your score means
Standard deviation
100, telling if it's a tight distribution or spread out
Empirical Rule: 68-95-99.7 rule for normal distribution, if you know the SD you can say 68% of data is within 1 standard deviation of the mean
If you get 200 (3 SD below the mean) only 0.15% are worse
Reliability of SAT
r = .9, pretty good
Effects of coaching on SAT validity: it's testing knowledge or ability to access resources
Validity of SAT
r = .5 with 1st year GPA in college
The .5 correlation doesn't apply here because of range restriction = no correlation
The problem is restricted range shows little correlation, e.g. Penn limits to high SAT scores so they can't compare grades because it makes no impact, no variety
Typical evidence for genes and intelligence
Compare MZ (identical) vs DZ (fraternal) twins, focus on raised apart twins vs raised apart because environment can play a factor
Adoption studies - they take on more traits from biological parents
Heritability
How people differ in intelligence, proportion of population variation due to genes, genes effect / (effect of genes + environment)
As environmental variation goes up, heritability goes down
Heritability of finger number is low, genes play a role but most variation is due to accidents, not genetic determination
Identical twins look alike because the environment treats them alike because they look alike, not because of genetics
IQs are going up (Flynn Effect) by about 3 points per decade, more on nonverbal tests
Expectancy (Rosenthal)
Fixed mindset vs growth mindset, performance vs mastery, kids got smarter when expected to by teachers (expectations made them rise up), mindset is important, self-fulfilling prophecy as kids get tracked
If expectancy can change performance it is clearly not due to genes
IQ tests often test motivation, not intelligence
Within group differences in intelligence are greater than between group differences, even if intelligence were 100% genetic it does not explain between group differences, which could be due to environment
Genetic does not mean unchangeable, e.g. PKU can be avoided by avoiding certain amino acids
Race
Hard to define because it's versatile
Stereotype Threat
Negative stereotypes = self-fulfilling prophecy, when facing challenging tests, stereotypes against one's culture can be stigmatizing and affect performance, but this effect disappears when the test is not framed as diagnostic
Asking for race can potentially cause priming and affect academic performance
Experiments show the difference in scores between men and women, or Asian women and math, disappears when the stereotype is not made salient
Practical intelligence is covered in Lecture 18
Freud's theory of personality
Unconscious - things we aren't aware of affecting our personality
Childhood events - experiences at a young age that affect how we think/who we are
Basic Drives - idea that we are pressured by drives like sex, aggression, death instinct and try to let off steam
Freud's therapy technique
Glove anesthesia - lost sensation in hand but nowhere else, suggesting a psychological condition is affecting something physical
Unconscious Drives
Sex, pleasure, aggression - civilized society doesn't allow acting on these so we repress them, leading to constant battle and illnesses
Free Association - person talks freely to reveal unconscious conflicts
Slips of the Tongue - revealing unconscious feelings
Freud's Personality System
ID - unconscious, pleasure principle
Ego - reality principle
Superego - conscience handed through society/parents
Ego gets Anxiety From
ID, Real World,Superego
Defense Mechanisms
Repression - unconscious repression to keep out of mind
Displacement - safer target
Sublimation - socially acceptable
Reaction Formation - do the opposite
Projection - put onto somebody else
Rationalization - reason away
Psychosexual Stages
Oral (0-18 months) - mouth, sucking
Anal (18-36 months) - bowels, elimination
Phallic (3-6) - genitals, Oedipus/Electra complex
Latency (6-puberty) -
Genital (puberty on) -
Fixation in Psychosexual Stages
Makes up for deficit of pleasure in one stage so go back to it, e.g. lack of oral stage leads to smoking
Oedipus Complex
Believed every man subconsciously wants to sleep with mother and kill father, resolved through identification with father and development of superego
Electra Complex
Girl's desire for father and jealousy of mother, resolved through identification with mother
Evidence for Freud's claims includes "kinder/gentler" defense mechanisms, projection study showing false consensus effect, and terror management theory