Problems with storage, time passage, personal reasons, or the condition of the brain
Interference
Forgetting because other information gets in the way of what we want to recall
Proactive Interference
Old memories interfere with recall of new information
Retroactive Interference
New memories interfere with recall of old information
Brown-Peterson Paradigm
1. Participants given 3 consonants to remember
2. Participants given a 3 digit number and asked to count backwards by threes
3. After varying delays, participants asked to recall the 3 letters
Trigrams were forgotten by 18 seconds due to retroactive interference of counting backwards
Keppel & Underwood (1962)
1. Replicated the Peterson and Peterson Task varying the same delay to recall
2. Analysis done by trial number (1st trial, 2nd trial, 3rd trial, etc)
3. Found support for proactive interference
Retroactive interference from LTM
The experimental group will remember less material from the tested list A compared to the control group
Proactive Interference from LTM
The experimental group remembers less materials from the tested list B than the control group
Primary Effect
Remember the first part
Recency Effect
Remember the last part
Spacing Effect
When you are given ample of time to rehearse
Distinctiveness
Unique or different
Clustering
Correlate with similar terms
Serial position effect
We remember the first and last items in a list best
After a delay, we only remember the first items best
Immediate recall: first and last items best
Later recall: only the first items recalled well
Serial Position curve
We show superior recall of words close to the end of a list (the recency effect), pretty good recall of words close to the beginning of the list (primary effect), and relatively poor recall of words in the middle of the list
Spacing effect
We retain information better when we rehearse over time
Participants who used spaced practice on memory tasks outperformed those using massed practice in 259 out of 271 cases
Ebbinghaus (1885): spacing out periods of learning improves later recalls of the information
When spacing is very short, people do better on immediate testing, but worse when tested later on
Cramming might be better than nothing
Autobiographical memory
Memory of personal history
Owens, Bower and Black (1979)
Nancy arrived at the cocktail party...
Nancy woke up feeling sick and she wondered if she were pregnant...
The theme offered some background information and some retrieval cues, which increased recall
However, the background info also led to more intrusions (memory for information not present), such as "the professor got Nancy pregnant"
Schacter's "seven sins of memory"
Transience
Absent-mindedness
Blocking
Misattribution
Suggestibility
Bias
Persistence
Eyewitness testimonies
Episodic memory of specific event, often a crime
Eyewitness memory, which is relied upon in the process of eyewitness identification, is thought to be fragile and easily distorted by information obtained post-event
The single greatest cause of wrongful convictions nationwide, playing a role in more than 75% of convictions overturned through DNA testing
Vulnerability of post event distortion
Interference theory
Verbal overshadowing of visual cue
Cars smashed/hit
Loftus and Palmer (1974)
Participants asked "how fast were the cars going when they smashed into each other?" vs "how fast were the cars going when they hit each other?"
Problems with lineups
Assumption that perpetrator is in lineup
Distractor selection is also important
Police behavior may also influence
Children's eyewitness memory
When a child is an eyewitness, they are typically asked questions to prompt information
Caution must be used to avoid "leading questions" or questions that suggest an answer
By the age of 10-11, children are no more susceptible than adults but younger children are more likely to be misled
Repeated questioning may lead a child to fabricate events that never happened
Roediger & Mcdermott (1995)
Present a list of associated words, missing one "target" word
With immediate recall, participants tend to recall the non-presented target items
Participants report an actual memory for the item
Garry, Manning, Loftus and Sherman (1996)
Participants complete Life Events Inventory (LEI)
Then are led through imagination exercises
Fill out LEI again
Imagining an event can increase a person's belief that the fictitious event actually happened