An expert's statement based on studies and data from credible sources
Claim of value
A subjective statement primarily influenced by a person's culture, background, religion, and other personal factors
Formulating counterclaims for a claim of fact
1. Understand the central claim and examine the supporting information
2. Determine the strengths and weaknesses of the author's claim
3. Think of opposing arguments that can disprove or weaken the central claim and cite textual evidence
4. Formulate your counterclaims and provide the necessary support
Gaining a different perspective on a claim of fact
1. Verify the cited source of the claim
2. Check other sources that support the claim
Formulating counterclaims for a claim of value
1. Identify the limitations of the author's point of view
2. Find flaws in the author's reasoning
3. Examine the standards the author uses as a basis for their claim
Claim of policy
A claim that argues for or against a course of action
Formulating counterclaims for a claim of policy
1. Assess the course of action proposed by the author in terms of its feasibility and effectiveness
2. Cite some critical studies related to the author's proposition
Assertion
A statement or declaration made regarding an idea, a topic, or an issue that expresses a person's opinion, feelings, or belief
Types of assertions
Basic assertion
Empathic assertion
Positive assertion
Confrontive assertion
Escalating assertion
I-language assertion
Basic assertion
A simple and direct expression of one's opinion, feelings, or belief
Empathic assertion
Shows sympathy to another person, acknowledges the other person's feelings or situation, and shows support for the person's rights
Positive assertion
Expresses positive feelings or emotions, gives a reason or an explanation for a good feeling or opinion
Confrontive assertion
States three closely related actions: an action that was supposed to be done, the actual action, and the action that the speaker wants to be done
Escalating assertion
A firm but respectful statement made by a person expecting another person's response to his or her earlier assertion, when the other person has not given any response
i-language assertion
Expresses negative feelings, describes the person's feelings toward a particular negative behavior, and states what he or she desires to happen
Intertextuality
The relationship formed between two texts
Julia Kristeva
A French author who coined the term intertextuality
Julia Kristeva: '"Any text is constructed as a mosaic of quotations: any text is the absorption and transformation of another."'
Intertextuality
Important to the creation of text
Important to the interpretation of text
Understanding the meaning of a text
Making sense of its connection or relationship with other texts
Forms of Intertextuality
Writer references a brief or prolonged portion of a literary text
Writer references a media or social text
Writer references a literary text
• He or she mentions the title of the book, uses one of its characters,
or recreates one of its scenes.
Writer references a media or social text
Mentions a film, TV show, song, or any event in society, history, politics, etc. and becomes part of the writing
Hypertext
An arrangement of information in a computer database, in which objects like text, pictures, and programs are linked to one another
The term "hypertext" was coined by Ted Nelson, an American pioneer of information technology
1965
Hypertext
It is a nonlinear way of showing information in a text
It happens when a reader chooses their own way of going about what they read
Hypertext (in literature)
A text that references, alludes to, or derives from another text, which is called the hypotext
Hypertext derives from hypotext
1. Through a process called transformation
2. The hypertext transforms, modifies, elaborates on, or extends the hypotext
Critique
An in-depth analysis of a particular work of art or a literary work
Critique
Argumentative in nature
Presents arguments about whether or not a particular work is good
Aims to persuade readers to ponder more about the work from the writer's perspective
Usually written by an expert on the matter
Uses a critical approach or theory to evaluate a particular work
May tackle either specific components of a work or its overall aesthetics
Has a specific audience
Often read by readers who have a similar educational or professional background as the author
Subjective
Written from the writer's perspective
Critical of the work being examined and questions the validity and accuracy of the information presented and looking at it from a particular perspective
Features of a Critique
A critique is comprehensive. It contains a thorough discussion or analysis of the material. For every claim presented by the author, he or she clearly explains it and supports it with evidence.
A critique uses a specific approach or theory. A writer makes his or her observations and claims about the text based on the theory then cites portions of it as support.
A critique can have an objective tone. Although the writer can be influenced by culture, social environment, and experiences, he or she can use an impartial tone to express his or her claims. Using the third-person point of view, for instance, allows the writer to put the focus on the critique rather than on himself or herself.
A critique uses formal language. The writer observes proper grammar, punctuation, and capitalization, among others. He or she makes sure that words or terms are correctly used, and he or she avoids using incomplete sentences or fragments.
A critique uses credible references. Each argument in a critique should be well supported. The evidence or supporting details should come from reliable sources.
Critique
Distinguishes from a review in terms of purpose, audience, and features
Tips for writing a critique
1. Read, watch, or listen to the material more than once
2. Develop an outline
3. Develop compelling claims
4. Present balanced information
5. Observe a logical structure
Logical structure of a critique
Introduction
Body (Summary, Review/Critique)
Conclusion
Introduction
Indicate the objectives and significance, include relevant information (creator, major elements, publication/release date, version/edition, publisher/producer)
Body
Summary
Review/Critique (analyze the material using an approach or theory, present arguments/counterarguments, use an organizational pattern)
Conclusion
State the intended scholarly or literary value, restate points/claims, present recommendations, list benefits for potential audience
Citing sources is an important practice to avoid plagiarism
Review
A writer's evaluation of a specific work of art in a general context, examines how a part contributes to the totality of a material, argumentative in nature, made for a general audience