Save
tort law
strict liability
Save
Share
Learn
Content
Leaderboard
Learn
Created by
Megan Dodds
Visit profile
Cards (15)
outraging public decency
gibson
and
sylveire
absolute liability
r v storkwain
strict liability
callow v tillstone
no-fault liability
cundy
v
le cocq
no ' due dilligence' defence
r
v
larsonneur
no defence of mistake
harrow LBD v
shah
and
shah
strict liability
actus reus
(
no mens rea required
)
strict liability
a
civil
action where fault of the defendent does not need to be
proven
absolute liability
the act that occurred was so bad that the defendant does not need to be proven
guilty
as it was so
bad
- R v larsonneur
winzar
v cheif constable of Kent
absolute liability
- he was on the
highway drunk
r v prince
strict liability
-
no mens rea
callow v tillstone
no fault liability but was guilty
harrow LBC v shah and shah
no due dilligence - did not check
ID
for a
lottery ticket
cundy v le cocq
no defence of mistake - did not realise the
guy
was
drunk
sherra v de rutzen
no defence mistake - D sold
alcohol
to an on duty police officer who had removed his
badge
in order to get served