Ppts only go through 1 condition each, Usually randomly allocated
Independent groups - pros
No order effect, Less time consuming (if all conditions can be conducted simultaneously)
Independent groups - cons
More ppts needed than repeated measures, Risk of ppt variables affecting the results (extraneous variable)
Repeated measures
All ppts take part in all conditions
Repeated measures - pros
Results not subject to ppt variables, This means there’s higher internal validity
Repeated measures - cons
Risk of ordereffects (their experiences in previous conditions influence how they behave in the next ones), This can be fixed using counter balancing - 1 group does 1 condition first, another group does the other condition first
Matched pairs
Ppts go through 1 condition each, Matched w another ppt doing the other condition based on relevant characteristics (e.g. age)
Matched pairs - pros
No order effect Reduced risk of ppt variables
Matches pairs - cons
Complex & time consuming, Needs more ppts
Independent variable
Experimenter manipulates, Assumed to have a direct effect on DV
Dependentvariable
The outcome or what is measured
Operantionalising variables
Making variable measurable/quantifiable E.g. can’t measure happiness but can measure how count how many times someone smiles, This makes it easier to replicate research
Extraneous variables
A variable that isn’t the IV but could have an effect on DV E.g. gender/age of ppt, demand characteristics
Demand characteristics
If the ppt works out the aims of the study, they may start acting differently & behave in a certain way E.g. in milgram‘s a study, they may have known the shocks were fake
Qualitative data
Any data that isn’t numerical
Qualitative data - pros
Flexible, Explores attitudes & behaviours in depth
Qualitative data - cons
Subjective - relies heavily on interpretation (subject to bias)Analysis can be timeconsuming
Quantitative data
Numerical data
Quantitative data - pros
Objective - not as subject to bias, Easier to analyse
Quantitative data - cons
Not as flexible, Can’t explore in depth as much
Primary data
Data collected for the purposes of the study
Primary data - pros
Specific to the researchers needs
Primary data - cons
Takes longer to gather, Expensive
secondary data
Information that has been collected by someone other than the researcher