Research methods

Cards (26)

  • Independent groups design
    Ppts only go through 1 condition each, Usually randomly allocated
  • Independent groups - pros
    No order effect, Less time consuming (if all conditions can be conducted simultaneously)
  • Independent groups - cons
    More ppts needed than repeated measures, Risk of ppt variables affecting the results (extraneous variable)
  • Repeated measures
    All ppts take part in all conditions
  • Repeated measures - pros
    Results not subject to ppt variables, This means there’s higher internal validity
  • Repeated measures - cons
    Risk of order effects (their experiences in previous conditions influence how they behave in the next ones), This can be fixed using counter balancing - 1 group does 1 condition first, another group does the other condition first
  • Matched pairs
    Ppts go through 1 condition each, Matched w another ppt doing the other condition based on relevant characteristics (e.g. age)
  • Matched pairs - pros
    No order effect Reduced risk of ppt variables
  • Matches pairs - cons
    Complex & time consuming, Needs more ppts
  • Independent variable

    Experimenter manipulates, Assumed to have a direct effect on DV
  • Dependent variable
    The outcome or what is measured
  • Operantionalising variables
    Making variable measurable/quantifiable E.g. can’t measure happiness but can measure how count how many times someone smiles, This makes it easier to replicate research
  • Extraneous variables
    A variable that isn’t the IV but could have an effect on DV E.g. gender/age of ppt, demand characteristics
  • Demand characteristics
    If the ppt works out the aims of the study, they may start acting differently & behave in a certain way E.g. in milgram‘s a study, they may have known the shocks were fake
  • Qualitative data

    Any data that isn’t numerical
  • Qualitative data - pros
    Flexible, Explores attitudes & behaviours in depth
  • Qualitative data - cons

    Subjective - relies heavily on interpretation (subject to bias)Analysis can be time consuming
  • Quantitative data
    Numerical data
  • Quantitative data - pros
    Objective - not as subject to bias, Easier to analyse
  • Quantitative data - cons
    Not as flexible, Can’t explore in depth as much
  • Primary data
    Data collected for the purposes of the study
  • Primary data - pros

    Specific to the researchers needs
  • Primary data - cons
    Takes longer to gather, Expensive
  • secondary data

    Information that has been collected by someone other than the researcher
  • Secondary data - pros
    Takes less time to gather, Cheaper
  • Secondary data - cons
    Not specific to researchers needs