A type of social influence where there is a change in a person's behaviour or opinion as a result of a real or imagined pressure from a person or group of people
Types of conformity (Kelman)
Internalisation
Identification
Compliance
Internalisation
Making the beliefs, values, attitude and behaviour of the group your own (the strongest type of conformity, and often occurs as a result of informational social influence)
Identification
Temporary/short term change of behaviour and beliefs only in the presence of a group (middle level)
Compliance
Following other people's ideas/going along with the group to gain their approval or avoid disapproval (lowest/weakest level of conformity)
Informational Social Influence
When someone conforms because they want to be right, so they look to others by copying or obeying them, to have the right answer in a situation
Normative Social Influence
When someone conforms because they want to be liked and be part of a group
NSI and ISI may not be completely exclusive, as suggested by Deutsch and Gerrard's 'Two Process Model'
It may be more beneficial to look at NSI and ISI as complementary, as opposed to mutually exclusive mechanisms
Asch's study
123 male American undergraduates in groups of 6; consisting of 1 true participant and 5 confederates
Participants and confederates were presented with 4 lines; 3 comparison lines and 1 standard line
Confederates would give the same incorrect answer for 12 out of 18 trials
Asch observed how often the participant would give the same incorrect answer as the confederates versus the correct answer
Group size
An individual is more likely to conform when in a larger group
Unanimity of majority
An individual is more likely to conform when the group is unanimous i.e. all give the same answer, as opposed to them all giving different answers
Task difficulty
An individual is more likely to conform when the task is difficult
Zimbardo's study
24 American male undergraduate students
Participants were randomly issued one of two roles; guard or prisoner
Guards began to harass and torment prisoners in harsh and aggressive ways
Prisoners would only talk about prison issues and snitch on other prisoners to the guards
Agentic state
When a person believes that someone else will take responsibility for their own actions
Legitimacy of authority
How credible the figure of authority is. People are more likely to obey them if they are seen as credible in terms of being morally good/right, and legitimate
Situational factors
Factors in the situation that can influence obedience
Agentic state
When people believe they are acting on behalf of an authority figure, rather than taking personal responsibility for their actions
Legitimacy of authority
How credible the figure of authority is, in terms of being morally good/right, and legally based or law abiding
Students are more likely to listen to their parents or teachers than other unknown adults
Expert authority
When the authority figure is seen as legitimate because they are knowledgeable and responsible, such as a scientist
Zimbardo's study suffered from demand characteristics and lacked ecological validity
Zimbardo's sample only consisted of American male students, so the findings cannot be generalised to other genders and cultures
There was a lack of fully informed consent due to the deception required in the Stanford Prison Experiment
Zimbardo's participants were not protected from stress, anxiety, emotional distress and embarrassment
Proximity
Participants obeyed more when the experimenter was in the same room (62.5%) compared to separate rooms (40%) or touch proximity (30%)
Location
Participants obeyed more when the study was conducted at a prestigious university
Uniform
Participants obeyed more when the experimenter wore a lab coat
Demand characteristics were particularly evident in the uniform condition
Authoritarian personality
Belief that people should completely obey or submit to their authority figures, and suppress their own beliefs
Fixed cognitive style
Tendency to adopt absolutist/'black and white' thinking and not challenge stereotypes
Reaction formation
Displacing anger with parents onto seemingly 'inferior' others
The F-scale used to measure authoritarian personality is susceptible to acquiescence bias
Adorno's psychodynamic theory
A person's personality traits and attitudes as an adult stemmed from childhood influences such as that of one's parents
Scapegoating
Child with overly harsh and disciplinarian parents displaces their anger with their parents onto seemingly 'inferior' others
On a surface level, the child would idolise their parents, but on an unconscious level, they would fear and despise them, and so arises the need to displace such anger
The child would be more likely to target their displaced anger on those who seem weak and unable to defend themselves, such as minority groups
Reaction formation
The process where the child displaces their anger onto seemingly 'inferior' others
Reaction formation is often seen in current politics
Acquiescence bias
Respondents always responding in the same way using the scales provided, regardless of the content shown in the scales