While in school, you learn different norms and values but this is not a result of the lessons but a result of the values in school
Cultural capital
The knowledge, values, and ideas that people have about life e.g. language
Social capital
Having connections and contacts to be able to get far in life
Feminisation of education
More females are in education e.g. more female teachers than male teachers
Teacher expectations
How teachers see a student and how likely they think you are to achieve something
Teacher Labelling
Teachers attaching name or tag to your identity
Self-fulfilling prophecy
When a student constantly hears a label, so they start to believe it and act like it
Formal curriculum
The subjects student pick and do
Pro school subculture
Student that agree and conform the schools' values
Anti school subculture
People that rebel to school values
Banding
Putting student into ability groups for all subjects
Setting
Putting people into ability groups for certain subjects
Institutional racism
When the whole entire system is racist down to the roots
Functionalism
Education is based of meritocracy
Meritocracy – everyone has equality and hard work is rewarded with good grade and the best jobs later in life
Hidden curriculum has a positive role, and it readies us for work
Parsons – education acts as a bridge between family and the wider society
Davis and Moore – Role Allocation – schools sort and select the most appropriate student for roles and jobs in the wider society, this is through their skill set
Marxism
Meritocracy is a myth – schools are rigged to benefit the bourgeoisie at the expense of the working class
The hidden curriculum plays a negative role – it readies us for work, exploitation and teaches us how to be obedient
Bowles and Gintis – Correspondence principle – schools mirror the workplace and correspond to the needs of capitalism and workplaces through the hidden curriculum
Bourdieu – Cultural capital – the middle class have a lot of cultural capital due to having good resources, but the working class do not due to a lack of resources. The bourgeoisie also have a lot of social capital which helps them get further in life
Willis – the education system is based off m/c values which w/c students unconsciously resist to making them fail in classes. This results into them entering an anti-school subculture like 'the lads
Feminism
Education maintains and justifies inequality
Schools run in favour of men and works to reflect a patriarchal society
There are gendered subjects, different teacher expectations and different representations of girls in school
Francis – schools mirror the patriarchal society; boys dominate spaces and time in schools, girls are marginalised due to this
Sue Lees – patriarchy and sexual control start in schools. There are sexual double standards. E.g. boys how have slept with a lot of people are glorified but women who have slept with a lot of people are sluts
Labelling
Can lead to a self-fulfilling prophecy
Self-fulfilling prophecy
When someone believe their label, they become a self-fulfilling prophecy
Ideal pupil
Every teacher has an 'ideal pupil' in their head and most the time it is with m/c values
Banding and setting
Strongly related to teacher labelling and self-fulfilling prophecy
When a student is smart or dumb, they will be put into a set or band thar can make them feel empowered or demotivated
These bands or sets can limit a student's grade
Ball – top and bottom bands respond to these labels and make them become a self-fulfilling prophecy
Keddie – students and different bands are taught differently so they perform as such in their exams e.g. sets 1 will try harder than set 4
Pro and anti-school subculture
Willis -1970s– saw how the w/c lads rejected the m/c values of the school and made their own set of values. There was more fun in having their own values than following the schools
Hargreaves - 1960s– saw how lower bands pupils turned to anti school subculture due to their label and become a self-fulfilling prophecy
Internal factors that can affects achievement
Labelling
Self-fulfilling prophecy
Banding
Setting
School subcultures
Hidden curriculum
Type of school attended
Gendered subjects
External factors that can affect achievement
Material deprivation – not having the resources needed to have a healthy lifestyle – e.g. income, occupation and poverty, access to resources, housing, diet, health
Cultural deprivation – not having the cultural capital (Bourdieu) needed to do well in school - e.g. language (Bernstein-m/c student have an elaborate code of language whilst w/c student have a restricted code of language), parental experiences, values and aspirations (young – 1967- parents have their own values about school which is passed onto students)
Social Class
m/c achieve more than w/c in both state and independent school
This can be due to labelling/SFP (Becker), banding and setting (Ball), subculture (Willis), school type
Because m/c student embody the 'ideal pupil' they will be labelled as such and achieve better
w/c children are more likely to live in worse housing and they don't have the money to buy the needed resources in school
W/c students tend to have parent that don't involve themselves with school which can leave them culturally deprived
m/c parents provide the resources and install pro school values into their children
Marxists see education as rigged and favour the ruling class, meritocracy is myth
Ethnicity
Chinese and Indian tend to perform better in schools
Black and w/c whites, and gypsies tend to perform worse
Can be due to racism, labelling due to students e.g. black kids are troublemakers
Black kids are more likely to be expelled or be in disabled
Can be due to institutional racism and there is ethnocentric curriculum which favours white history – this is different to other ethnic values which makes them underachieve
Lower s/c tend to be non-whites which leads to material and cultural deprivation
Lots of ethnic kids need to have EAL – effects their learning
Sewell – did a study on black children forming anti-school subculture – due to being grown in lone parent families
Link class and ethnicity
Gender
Girls outperform boys and get more GCSEs
There has been a feminisation of school
There are a lot of gendered subjects
Labelling may affect results
There is a changing role in women so there are more female teachers to inspire young girls
Sharpe – found that over year's young girls aspiration changed – the first most girls wanted to get husbands but after years most girl wanted to get jobs
More laws to help women
Feminism is more popular, so women are more inspired
Crisis of masculinity – males do not know what their role in society is anymore
Types of research
Questionnaires – primary – set of written questions given to a participant