Ayllon and Azim used a tokeneconomy in a SZ ward. A gifttoken was given for everytidying act which were laterswapped for privileges like films.Mason et al. identified 3categories of institutionalbehaviour which occurs in long-termhospitaltreatment that could be tackledusingtokeneconomies. The 3 categories were:
personalcare
socialbehaviour
conditionrelatedbehaviour
Modifying these had majorbenefits such as quality of life and to 'normalises' behaviour
Token economies improve the quality of life within in the hospitalsetting like putting on makeup or becomingmoresocial with other residents
Token economies normalisebehaviour as they encourage the return to more'normal'behaviour, making it easier to adaptback into the community like getting dresses or making your bed
Token economies are an example of operantconditioning as they are an example of behaviourmodificationbased on operantconditions.Tokens are secondaryreinforcers as they are exchanged for rewards.Tokens that can be exchanged for a range of differentprimaryreinforcers are calledgeneralisedreinforcers and these have a morepowerfuleffect.
One strength of token economies is evidence of effectiveness. Glowacki et al. identified7highquality studies published between 1999 and 2013 on the effectiveness of tokeneconomies in a hospitalsetting.All the studies showed a reduction in negativesymptoms and a decline in frequency of unwanted behaviours. This supports the value of tokeneconomies
one limitation of token economies is the ethicalissuesraised.Professionals have the power to control peoples behaviour and this means imposingonepersonsnorms onto others. Also, restricting the availability of pleasures to people who dontbehave as desired means that veryill people, already experiencing distressingsymptoms, have an evenworsetime. This means that benefits of tokeneconomies may be outweighed by the impact on freedom and shorttermreduction in quality of life