Delphy and Leonard emphasise the importance of work from a radical feminist perspective
Delphy and Leonard's view
It is men, rather than capitalists, who benefit most from the exploitation of women's labour
The family
Has a central role in maintaining patriarchy
The family
Is an economic system involving a particular set of labour relations in which men benefit from and exploit the work of women
Women are oppressed because their work is taken for granted within the family
When wives have paid employment outside the home they still have to carry out household tasks which are not equally shared with their male partners
Perspective of Delphy and Leonard
Radical feminist
It is men, not capitalists, who benefit more from the exploitation of women's labour
Patriarchy
The family has a central role in maintaining it
The family
Is viewed as an economic system
The family is a patriarchal organisation where the men benefit from the free labour provided by their wives
Housework and childcare is provided by the female of the house
The man's position in the family is a dominant one whilst the women and children have a subordinate position
Even when women have paid employment outside the home, they still have to undertake household tasks and care for the children
Talcott Parsons' two irreducible functions of the family
1. Primary socialisation
2. Stabilisation of adult personalities
Primary socialisation
The process through which people learn how to behave in society - what is normal and what is important
Secondary socialisation
Learning universalistic values through school, the media and other agents of socialisation
Agents of socialisation
Institutions that teach people the norms and values of society
Instrumental role
The role performed by men, involving discipline and earning money
Expressive role
The role performed by women, involving caring, nurturing and raising children
Gender division of labour
The idea that men and women perform very different roles
Warm bath theory
The idea that the family helps to deal with the difficulties and challenges of life, providing care and support
5 types of family diversity identified by Rapoport and Rapoport
Organisational
Cultural
Social Class
Life course
Generational
Rapoport and Rapoport carried out groundbreaking research into family life
Ann Oakley defined the conventional family as "nuclear families composed of legally married couples, voluntarily choosing to have children"
Conventional family
Nuclear families composed of legally married couples, voluntarily choosing parenthood of one or more children
The conventional family was portrayed as the "normal" or "cereal packet family" in television advertisements and soap operas
Conventional family
It was a form of social control, as people were expected to live in these families and this made it harder to live alternative lives
Even in the early 1980s, the conventional family was being challenged as people explored different ways of living and different arrangements
Oakley critically examined the idea of the conventional family and looked at where the idea that this was the "normal" way to live came from, and the influence it has over society and individuals
Oakley noted that, even in the early 1980s, the conventional family was being challenged as people were exploring different ways of living and different arrangements that worked for them and did not conform to convention
Stratified diffusion
Changes in norms and values tend to start among the wealthier in society and then others start to behave in the same way
Willmott and Young's prediction that the next stage of the family would be the asymmetric family has not turned out to be accurate, with - if anything - family life becoming more symmetrical since 1973
Private sphere
The family and personal relationships
Public sphere
The economy and work
Family in capitalist society
Women became responsible for personal relationships within the family and for family member's emotional wellbeing
The family serves the interests of capitalism by providing unpaid domestic labour, reproducing social classes, and being a vital unit of consumption
Zaretsky believes that the family is not able to fully meet people's emotional and social needs, and can only cushion them from the harsh effects of capitalism