they’re easily left behind and it’s unintentional, this can lead to associations between crime scenes
they also imply source (what’s found) and activity (how has it ended up there)
source
doestheevidencecomefromthatspecificsource
compare the evidence to crime
activity
even if the material comes from the source, was thesuspectevencommittingsaidact
compare material with findings
mechanisms= transfer and persistence
transfer
evidence is lost
source to recipetant
(recall window example)
modes of transfer
primaryA to B
secondaryA to B to C
whats fibres
natural filament
yarn to textiles
two types, natural and synthetic
natural fibres
animal such as wool
minerals such as asbestos
veg such as cottonplant
synthetic
acrylic
polyester
most common traces
glass fibres
laboratory examination
evidence recovery
analysis
comparison
evaluation
verification
3 methods of evidence recovery
lifting
taping
shaking
lifting
searchedbyeye
picked by tweezers
placed in petridish
taping
evidence is covered in tapes
tapes collectedonsheet
shaking
item shaken on collecting surface
everything recovered in petri dish
stage 1
opticalmethods
naked eye
light microscope
moregeneral less destructive
stage 2
intermediate instruments
refractive method index
stage 3
advanced instruments
TLC
LC electron microscope
less general more destructive
intrinsic
characteristics of the trace itself - physical properties such as coloursizetextureshape
extrinsic
characteristics that result from the interactionbetweentraceandenvironment- transfer evidence such as the presenceoffibres for a suspects clothing on a victims body
what does the transfer of material depend on
donor
recipient
area of contact
duration of contact
number of contact
pressure of contact
what does persistence depend on
donor
recipeint
timesincedepostion
physicochemical characteristics of fibres
shape
colour
type
what is glass
hardbrittletransparent, used to make windows, drinking containers and other articles