R 2.8 - Subject to the obligation on a lawyer to protect privileged communications, a lawyer who has reasonable grounds to suspect that another lawyer may have engaged in misconduct must make a confidential report to the Law Society
Reporting unsatisfactory conduct
R 2.9 - Subject to the obligation on a lawyer to protect privileged communications, a lawyer who has reasonable grounds to suspect that another lawyer may have engaged in unsatisfactory conduct may make a confidential report to the Law Society
Exceptions to reporting misconduct
A lawyer who is a victim of the suspected misconduct
Where a lawyer reasonably believes the disclosure would pose a serious risk to the health (including mental health) or safety of a victim
Legal representation is essential to render the right to access justice effective
Causes/factors for failure to access justice
Cultural inflexibility
Eurocentricity is alienating
Individualistic/blame rather than cultural preferences for community and family involvement
Mysterious and unfriendly
Hard to get even basic information
Geographic
Language barriers
Jargon
Legal ignorance
Physical barriers for those with disabilities
Cost of legal services
Rights of persons charged under NZBORA s24
Shall be informed promptly and in detail of the nature and cause of the charge
Shall have the right to consult and instructa lawyer
Shall have the right to receive legal assistance without cost if the interests of justice so require and the person does not have sufficient means to provide for that assistance
Trio of responses to the financial barrier
Taxpayer - Legal Services Act 2011
Lawyers - Conditional/contingency fees
Lawyers - Pro bono work
R9
A lawyer must not charge a client more than a fee that is fair and reasonable having regard to the interests of both client and lawyer and to the factors set out in rule 9.1
Factors in R9.1 for determining a fair and reasonable fee
Time spent and results achieved
Importance of matter to client
Value of property involved
Going rate in the market
Urgency and time limits imposed
Legal Services Act 2011 Purpose
To promote access to justice by establishing a system that provides legal services to people of insufficient means and delivers those services in the most effective and efficient manner
Examples of legal services under the LSA 2011
Legal Aid
Community Law Centres
Public Defence Service (PDS)
Duty Lawyers Scheme
Police Detention Legal Assistance Scheme
Victim Support
Family Law Services
Youth Law Services
Legal Aid Scheme
Government (tax-payer) funded programme to pay a lawyer'sfee if the client cannot afford a lawyer
Criteria for granting legal aid for criminal offences
Applicant must establish they are a natural person, have insufficient means, and either they are charged with or convicted of a criminal offence punishable by 6 months imprisonment or more or it is in the interests of justice to grant legal aid
Criteria for granting civil legal aid
Applicant must establish they are a natural person, their income and disposablecapital does not exceed the prescribedthresholds, and they have reasonable grounds for taking or defending the proceedings
Civil legal aid coverage
Family and domestic disputes dealt with by the Family Court
Taking a case (Plaintiff) or defending a case (Defendant) in DC or HC
Some disputes before tribunals and specialist courts
Civil legal aid not covered
Disputes Tribunal matters
Lawyer's work not involving court
Disputes involving schools, universities and other educational institutions
Election petitions
Community Law Centres
Bodies whose function includes the provision of community legal services
Community Law Centres give advice and assistance
Services provided by Community Law Centres
Free legal information/advice
Representation to people with insufficient means to pay
Law-related education and information
Law reform submissions
Pro bono clearing house
Public Defence Service (PDS)
A government funded agency of salaried defence lawyers who defend people on criminal charges who are eligible for legal aid
PDS is the "Largest criminal law practice in NZ"
PDS
1. Started as a pilotscheme in 2004
2. Greatly expanded
Duty Lawyers scheme
Ensures there is a sufficient number of lawyers available in each District Court to assist, advise, and represent unrepresented defendants charged with an offence
The Duty Lawyers scheme does not operate for civil proceedings
Duty Lawyers scheme
1. Assists unrepresented defendants on their first day in criminal court
2. Advise on plea / bail / legal aid / remand / sentence
3. Ensures smooth operation of the courts
Police Detention Legal Assistance Scheme (PDLA)
Ensures a sufficient lawyers available to provide legaladvice or legal assistance to any person questioned by police, whether arrested or not, or whom the police want to question in relation to an offence that they are suspected of committing
Conditional/Contingency Fees
An agreement pursuant to which the payment of a lawyer's fee is contingent on a specified event, usually the success of the litigation - no win, no fee
Different types of conditional/contingency fees
Speculative - normal fee only if successful
Bare percentage - fixed % of winnings
Sliding percentage - % gets higher as case progresses
Fee premium - normal fee plus a premium
In NZ, only speculative and fee premium conditional fees are acceptable under the Legal Complaints Act</b>
Conditional fees are not permitted in FamilyCourt cases, immigration cases or criminal cases
Requirements for conditional fees in NZ
Advise client about legalaid possibilities
5 working day 'cooling off' period for client
Totalfee must be fair and reasonable
Must be in writing, define "success" and detail how expenses will be charged
At end of the work lawyer must give the client a bill which discloses the normal fee and the premium
Arguments against conditional/contingency fees
Divergence of interests in some cases
Compromises ethical conduct
Loss of objectivity
Fee chasing / stirring up litigation
Increase in cost of litigation services overtime
Legal aid more appropriate funding method
Arguments in favour of conditional/contingency fees
Access to justice
Work more effectively and efficiently
Particularly effective for class actions
Freedom of contract
Pro bono
Services "in the public good"/for the good of the state/community, provided by lawyers without fee or at a reduced fee to clients who have nootheraccess to the courts/legal system or whose cases raise wide publicinterest issues
Pro bono should be limited to giving legal assistance for free to people who have legal problems and whose incomes places them in the justice gap - i.e. don'tqualifyforlegalaid
Motivations for Pro bono
Duty
Compulsion
Altruism
Colleagues' approbation
Client expectations
Future employee expectations
Spin-offs
Duty
The obligation to uphold the rule of law and to facilitate the admin of justice
Pros of compulsory pro bono in Aotearoa|NZ
Dutyarguments - cost of monopoly, commitment to justice system/rule of law, specially situated/suited to assist
Egoistic argument - prestige/publicity/flow of paid work
Good for students and early career lawyers - experience/educational, sets pattern for future practice
Cons of compulsory pro bono in Aotearoa|NZ
Definitionissues - what is/isn't pro bono, who is "in need"
No comparableduty in other professions/trades
No duty to be charitable, libertarian argument - lawyers should be free to choose
Illegitimatetax, government avoids responsibility
Demandexceeds supply, second rate service, demotivating/won't give full effort
Conduct and CareRules apply whether lawyer's work is paid or not