4 principal assumptions that define the main lines of realist thought and how theories and hypotheses are developed
4 principal assumptions of realism
States are the principal actors in an anarchical world
The state is viewed as a unitary actor
The state is a rational actor
National or international security have main priority
States
They represent the key unit of analysis in the international system
Non-state actors (such as the UN) aspire to have the status of an independent actor but are unable to achieve it
Realists see international organizations as doing what is indicated by their member states (therefore not being independent)
Multinational corporations, terrorist groups, and other transnational and nongovernmental organizations are seen as less important by realists
Unitary state
Realists see the state as an integrated unit vs the outside world
It does not take into consideration domestic actions and interactions
Realists assume that issues are important enough, higher authorities will intervene to prevent bureaucratic issues or action by nongovernmental actors
States might have internal misunderstanding but come to a common understanding to provide the same voice externally
Rational state
In their decision process states they exemplify objectives, consideration of all possible outcomes
Through the use of this analysis states are able to make rational decisions based on what best benefits them
Rationalists also take into consideration difficulties of a state being rational (e.g. not having all the possible info to make an accurate decision, human bias and misperception)
National/international security
Have main priority for realists
Economic matters are important to the extent that they contribute to the power or relative power of the state
States use power in terms of their capabilities compared to another state
Types of power distribution in the international system
Unipolar (one great power)
Bipolar (two great powers)
Multipolar (three or more great powers)
Realism focuses on power and balance of power
Influencers of realism
Thucydides
Niccolo Machiavelli
Hobbes
Hugo Grotius
Carl von Clausewitz
Sun Tzu
Geopolitical writers (e.g. Sir Halford Mackinder)
Carr
Niebuhr
Hans J Morgenthau
John H. Herz
Joseph Nye
Waltz
Power
Core concept for realists
Some see it as the sum of military, economic, technological, diplomatic and other capabilities of the state, while others see it as not absolute but instead as capabilities relative to the capabilities of other states
Dynamic definition of power: interactions of states, states' willingness to use capabilities, and their control/influence over other states
Soft power
Cultural dimensions or values that identity and practices of a state
Hard power
Economic and military capabilities
Reification is treating abstractions as if they are real and have a life of their own
Game theory
An approach to determining rational choice or optimum strategy in a competitive situation
Anarchy
Absence of any legitimate power above states (states are sovereign)
Security dilemma
The more one state arms to protect itself from other states, the more threatened these states become and more prone they are to resort to arming themselves to protect their national security interests
State of nature
A world without government or any other form of social structure
Two understandings of the state of nature based on realism
States will intervene if one begins gaining too much power
States follow international law
Types of balance of power
Bipolar balance of power (two states of comparable or relatively equal great power)
Multipolar balance of power (three or more states engaging in checks and balances)
Voluntarism
Does not refer only to freedom of choice but also to the ability of human beings to influence the course of events
Agent-structure events
How economic, social and political structures impact outcomes
Waltz says that multipolar balance of power is less effective as it increases uncertainty
Singer and Deutsch say multipolar balance of power is more effective as uncertainty breeds caution (meaning states follow regulations to avoid deviations)
Offense-defense balance
At any point the military power can favor offense or defense
Defense - conquest is difficult, with little incentive to use force to gain power
Offense - temptation for states to conquer one another
Cooperation is limited by two concerns: relative gains and prospect of cheating
Balancing
Allying with others against the prevailing threat that is the dominant tendency in international politics
Bandwagoning
Allying with stronger state
Power transition
A state will attempt to change the international system if the expected benefits exceed the expected costs
Hegemony
Leadership of a certain state over an issue
Idealists view how the world ought to be, while realists view how the world is
Realism has several critiques as it views the world in a much aggressive way which may also lead to war due to the extremes presented
Offense-defense balance
At any point the military power can favor offense or defense
Defense-conquest is difficult, with little incentive to use force to gain power.
Offense- temptation for states to conquer one another
Policy implication is that states should carefully consider the real possibility that moderates strategies may enhance their security, expansion may be the option to achieving their goals