community rehabilitation companies as a limitation of probation
- worked on a 'payment-by-result' basis meaning they were focused on the numbers and not rehabilitating offenders
- only 54% of cases supervised by them were provided w adequate housing support, compared to 70% of NPS cases
- offenders often supervised over telephone therefore no social interaction was had
- staff underestimated the risk of offending in 70% of cases, predominantly DA cases, meaning victims weren't fully protected