N1 form is filed at any crown or high court,Once D received the claim:admits claim & pays,defend claim by issuing an N9 or send a defence (court allocates case to a track)
Usually heard by the next court in the hierarchyThere must be legal grounds for the appeal (not just the judge for it wrong)Court can agree w the OG decision or reverse it
Introduced the 3 track system - processes cases faster, keeps costs downSimplified documents & procedureP: greater cooperation between partiesC: process still slow & expensive
Fairness - Judges are impartial, qualified & experiencedEnforcement - decisions or orders legally binding so must be adhered toAppeals - Cases can be appealed if a party isn't happy
Cost - can be very expensive (e.g. loser pays winners fees, lawyers required)Delays - many pre-trial procedures increasing the costsComplex - procedures & paperwork involved makes it difficult for individuals to understandUncertainty - despite precedent, no guarantee of the judgement
Possible where:Where the jury was ‘nobbled’ (bribed or threatened)Criminal justice act 2003 - gave the power to appeal a judges decision on a point of law e.g. Nederick & WoolinWhere there is new compelling evidence of guilt (Stephen Lawrence)
Where all criminal cases start for trial or sentencingTry all summary offences & some TEW offencesPreliminary matters connected to criminal cases (e.g. warrant)