Durkheim was the most important forerunner of functionalism. He was concerned by rapid social change from a traditional society with a simple social structure to a complex modern society
Based on mechanical solidarity with little division of labour, where its members were all fairly alike. A strong collective conscience bound them so tightly together that individuals in the modern sense did not really exist
Has a complex division of labour, which promotes differences between groups and weakens social solidarity. Greater individual freedom must be regulated to prevent extreme egoism from destroying all social bonds
Durkheim sees society as a separate entity existing over and above its members - a system of external social facts shaping their behaviour to serve society's needs
Functionalists see society as like a biological organism. Parsons identifies three similarities between society and an organism: 1) Both are self-regulating systems of inter-related, interdependent parts that fit together in fixed ways. 2) Organisms have needs that must be met if they are to survive; e.g. society's members must be socialised if society is to continue. 3) The function of any part of a system is the contribution it makes to meeting the system's needs and thus ensuring its survival
Social order is achieved through a central value system or shared culture: a set of norms, values, beliefs and goals shared by members of a society. Parsons calls this value consensus and sees it as the glue that holds society together
Through socialisation in the family, education, work etc, individuals internalise the system's norms and values so that society becomes part of their personality structure
Positive sanctions reward conformity, negative ones punish deviance. Socialisation and social control ensure that individuals are oriented towards pursuing society's shared goals and meeting its needs
Traditional societies with ascribed status (relationships are broad and multi-purpose, norms are particularistic, immediate gratification is emphasised, the group's interests come first)
Modern societies with achieved status (relationships are limited to specific purposes, norms are universalistic, deferred gratification is emphasised, individualistic orientation)
Merton criticises three key assumptions made by Parsons: 1) Indispensability - Parsons sees everything in society as functionally indispensable in its existing form. 2) Functional unity - Parsons claims all parts of society are tightly integrated into a single whole. 3) Universal functionalism - Parsons sees everything in society as performing a positive function
Functionalism is criticised for being teleological (explaining things in terms of their purpose or function) and unfalsifiable (its claims cannot be disproven)
Marxists argue that shared values are not agreed but imposed on society in the interests of the dominant class. Conflict theorists see functionalism as a conservative ideology legitimating the status quo
Wrong criticises functionalism's 'over-socialised' or deterministic view of individuals as mere puppets of the social system, with no free will or choice
Parsons argues that these changes from traditional to modern society are gradual, coming about due to increasing complexity and structural differentiation
The function of value consensus is to make social order possible by integrating individuals into the social system, directing them to meeting the system's needs
Adaptation - social system meets member's needs through the economic sub-system
Goal attainment - society needs to set goals and allocate resources to meet them, which the political sub-system sees to
Integration - different system parts must integrate together to pursue shared goals, the sub-system of education, religion and media has this role
Latency - maintaining society over time, which the kin sub-system does through pattern maintenance (socialising us to do what is required) and tension management (place to let off steam after work)