Series of documents which set out fundamental laws
Uncodified constitution
Easier to amend
Constitution
Describes system of territorial government (regions)
Sets out charter of fundamental rights
Doctrine of constitution coincides with historical moment
US constitution: created after war of independence
South African constitution: created after end of apartheid
UK constitution is not one single document, comprised of various sources as it was not created in one specific place in time
US and French constitutions were made after specific events (civil war, revolutions) but UK was not, no specific point in time
Magna Carta 1215
Limitation of royal power
Became constitutional document as showed fundamental rights
Powers that the king had became limited - forced to agree to terms of Magna Carta
Reliance of Magna Carta to show that some aspects of constitution are fundamental (right to justice, just trial, liberties)
Civil War
1. King lost to parliament
2. King increasingly worried of parliament authority
3. King thought he had divine right→ right to arrest MP's
4. Parliament resisted his authority
5. King executed for this 1649
English Bill of Rights 1689
James II opposed will of parliament → fled
William III offered throne- new king from Holland → became British king
Later enacted as Parliament Recognition Act 1689
Reduced power of any future king + recognised Parliament power
Power vested in king in parliament, not king alone
Taxation requires parliamentary approval
Protestant monarchy guaranteed
Sources of UK constitution
Statute law
Common law
European Union law
European Convention on Human Rights
Legal treatises
Law and custom of parliament
Royal prerogative
Constitutional conventions
UK constitution becomes increasingly parliamentary in 19th century, becomes more democratic
Constitutional statutes
Laws not created by king but through parliamentary process (have to go through Westminster parliament: house of commons and house of lords and royal assent)
Bill of Rights 1689
Limited powers of monarchy- affirmation of parliament
Secures protestant succession of monarchy
Act of Settlement 1701
Followed Bill of Rights
How royal succession should take place to exclude Roman Catholics
Protestant succession
Act of Union with Scotland 1707
Combined Scotland and England
Scotland agreed to give up its parliament- if Scottish members partook in English parliament
Reform Acts of 1832/1918
Right to vote extended
Movements, struggles = succession of acts
Parliament Acts 1911-1949
Restricted powers of House of Lords
Aristocracy growing problem
House of Lords not same now as was in 19th century- changed again
Statute of Westminster 1931
Could no longer legislate for dominions without consent (Canada, Australia)
Came from Balfour Declaration 1926
Slowly withdrew from colonies- gave up jurisdiction
European Communities Act 1972
Able to join EU because parliament made statute
Incorporated aspects of Treaty of Rome for it to be valid
Human Rights Act 1998
Incorporated ECHR
Recognition of certain citizen rights
Constitutional Reform Act 2005
Change courts- Supreme Court created outside parliament
Recognised separation of powers
EU (Withdrawal Agreement) Act 2020
UK still remains subject to some EU laws
Kept ECHR aspects
Thoburn v Sunderland
Piece of legislation which determines legal relationship between citizen and state qualifies as a statute
Entick v Carrington 1765
Common law: Judicial decisions are binding
Halifax acted for government authorised a search of Entick home using general warrant
Entick successfully sued government for trespassing
Search was abuse of power- no lawful authority
Judgement is affirmation of rule of law + sets limits on capacity of crown
Common law cases provide authority for constitutional principles such as the rule of law
Large part of law in UK created by judges- referred to as common law
Constitutional conventions
Customary rules which determine how discretionary powers are exercised
Not same as laws- cannot be enforced in court
Determine conduct of political actors: MP's, ministers, crown, judges
Jennings' 3 tests for recognising valid convention
1. Is there precedent? (How often and how consistently has practice been observed?)
2. Do those operating constitution accept conventions as binding? feel under obligation to act?
3. Is there good political reason for convention?
Most constitutional conventions created after 1689: reflect passage of power from absolute monarch to elected parliament from which government is formed (Bill of Rights 1689)
Emergence of cabinet/PM was an unofficial development
Last time PM came from House of Lords in 1902- after right to vote extended, democratic legitimacy crucial
Failure to follow conventions
Will lead to legal difficulties (Dicey)
Will lead to political difficulties (Jennings)
Characteristics of UK constitution
Reliance on constitutional conventions
Constitutional monarchy
Common law as constitutional source
Characteristics of the contemporary UK constitution
Human Rights Act 1998 incorporates ECHR into domestic law
Devolution of power to Wales, Scotland, Northern Ireland
Introduction of Supreme Court
EU law remains significant but diminishing source of UK law, despite Brexit
Constitutional origins of sovereignty
Reflected qualifications of absolute power of monarch
As king became less prominent- power of parliament increased
Magna Carta 1215
Limits by barons but revived numerous times
English Bill of Rights 1689
Effect is to severely limit power of king (can no longer do what he wishes to do, e.g: impose taxes, change state religion without approval)
Power under constitution has shifted from monarchy (powers of prerogative) to parliament exercising those powers
Dicey and legal sovereignty
Parliament is supreme law-making authority
1) Parliament has capacity to make and unmake laws without qualification
2) No parliament can bind successors (most recent law will trump older one)
3) No other bodies can challenge validity of primary legislation
Courts called upon to interpret legislation BUT do not have power to challenge/invalidate primary legislation