conformity: types & explanations

Cards (14)

  • Kelman, in 1958, identified 3 kinds of conformity: compliance, identification and internalisation.
  • compliance is 'going along with others' in public but not changing your views in private.
  • compliance is the shallowest form of conformity, and only temporary.
  • identification is a moderate form of conformity, and only temporary.
  • identification is conforming to a group because they have something we value and want to be a part of it, we change our views publicly even when in private we dont agree wholeheartedly.
  • internalisation is the deepest form of conformity, and is permanent change.
  • internalisation is the genuine acceptance of a groups norms and beliefs, changing both public and private views.
  • Deutsch & Gerard identified a two-process model for explaining why people conform:
    1. Normative social influence (NSI)
    2. Informational social influence (ISI)
  • NORMATIVE SOCIAL INFLUENCE (NSI):
    • for social approval.
    • an emotional process.
    • type of conformity associated: compliance - temporary change.
    • occurs when we are with people that may reject us.
  • INFORMATIONAL SOCIAL INFLUENCE (ISI):
    • in order to be right.
    • cognitive process.
    • comformity associated = internalisation - permanent change.
    • occurs when we are in new situations, with ambiguity or crisis.
  • STRENGTH OF ISI:
    • Lucas et al (2006).
    • asked students to give answers to mathmatical problems, either easy or more difficult.
    • greater conformity to incorrect answers when they were more difficult questions.
    • most true for students who rated their maths ability as poor - didn't want to be wrong.
  • STRENGTH OF NSI:
    • Asch (1951).
    • when interviewing ppts after, some said they conformed because they were self-concious.
    • when they wrote down answers, conformity dropped to 12.5%.
  • LIMITATION: INDIVIDUAL DIFFERENCES IN NSI AND ISI
    • research says NSI does not affect everyone's behaviour in the same way.
    • those less concerned with being liked are less affected than those who are concerned with being liked- called nAffiliators (greater need for affiliation and relations with others).
    • same can be said for the affect of ISI.
  • STRENGTH: ISI AND NSI WORK TOGETHER:
    • it isnt always possible to be sure whether NSI or ISI that has caused the conformity - seen in the study by Schultz (2006).
    • 132 hotels - 794 hotel rooms - 1 week study.
    • guests randomly allocated to a condition:
    • control condition - door hanger about environmental benfits of reusing towels.
    • experimental condition - door hanger + told them 75% of guests chose to reuse each day.
    • findings : experimental reduced need for fresh towels by 25%.