form of social influence where a minority of people convince others to adopt their beliefs and behaviours.
leads to internalisation / convertion of private and public attitudes.
EXAMPLES OF MINORITY INFLUENCE:
nelson mandela.
BLM.
LGBTQ+ rights.
nazism.
MOSCOVICI'S STUDY - BLUE GREEN SLIDES:
group of 6 participants asked to view 36 slides thta varied in shades and intensity of blue.
had to identify if the slide was blue or green.
each group = 4 participants and 2 confederates (minority).
consistent experimental condition - confederates said blue slides were green.
inconsistent condition - confederates called the slides green on 2/3 of trials and 1/3 called them blue.
control condition - 6 participants and no confederates, ppts called slides blue throughout.
MOSCOVICI'S FINDINGS:
consistent condition - influenced by minority on 8.4% of trials, 32% were influenced on atleast one trial.
inconsistent condition - participants were influenced by minority on 1.25% of the trials.
control condition - got the colour wrong 0.25% of trials.
STRENGTH - SCIENTIFIC:
controlled lab experiment.
quantitative and objective data.
scientific as it identified cause and effect.
creates internal validity.
STRENGTH - SUPPORTS CONSISTENCY:
displays that minority's must be consistent in order to have influence.
LIMITATION - UNGENERALISABLE:
all of the participants were women, cannot be generalise to all of he population.
has been suggested that menconform differently.
LIMITATION - LOW PERCENTAGES AND EXAGGERATION
there are 3 main processes in minority influence:
consistency.
flexible.
commitment.
CONSISTENCY:
consistency from a minority increases the amount of interest from others.
2 kinds: synchronic and diachronic.
synchronic consistency is consistency of the ideas among the members of the minority.
diaschronic consistency is consistency over time.
COMMITMENT
some engage in extreme activities to draw attention to their point.
invovinf risk to demonstrate their commitment.
the augmentation principle - makes the majority pay more attention.
FLEXIBILITY:
nemeth - agrues being extremely consistent and repeating the same arguments over again can be seen as rigid and inflexible - does not influence the majority.
the minority need to be prepared to adapt their point of view and accept reasonable and valid counter-arguments.
key = strike balance between consistency and flexibility.
LIMITATION - ARTIFICAL TASK
lacks external validity.
Moscovici.
research is far removed from how minorities attempt to change behaviour.
tells us little about how minorities operate in real life.
STRENGTH - RESEARCH SUPPORT FOR INTERNALISATION.
Moscovici variation - ppts wrote answers down rather than speaking aloud.
private agreement with the minority position was greater.
appears the majority were convinced by the minority but were reluctant to admit it publically.
might be due to the fear iof being associated with the minority or being viewed as a radical.
STRENGTH - RESEARCH SUPPORT FOR CONSISTENCY:
moscovici.
showed consistent minority opinion had a greater effect on the majority then wehn the minoiryt was inconsistent in what they were saying - synchronic consistency.