Supreme Court is the head of the Indian judiciary and supervises the functions of the lower courts
Single civil and criminal system of laws operates all over the country
Cases from the High Court may be taken to the Supreme Court by way of appeal
Supreme Court
Highest court of appeal in the country
The Supreme Court is located in New Delhi
Composition of the Supreme Court of India
Consists of the Chief Justice of India and not more than 33 other judges
Qualifications required for appointment as judges of the Supreme Court
Citizen of India
Judge of a High Court for five years or of two and more such courts in succession
Distinguished jurist in the opinion of the President
Advocate of a high court for at least ten years or of two or more such courts in succession
Appointment of judges of the Supreme Court
1. President appoints the judges in consultation with the other judges of the Supreme Court, High Court and Council of Ministers
2. The senior most judge is made the Chief Justice of India
3. Appointment of all judges (Excluding chief justice) shall be done only after consultation with Chief Justice(consultation being concurrence)
Appointment of Ad Hoc Judges
1. Judges of High Courts may be appointed as ad hoc judges of the Supreme Court by the Chief Justice of India as and when necessary
2. Ad hoc judges are appointed after consultation with the Chief Justice of the concerned High Court and with the consent of the President
Term of Office
The judge of a Supreme Court holds office until he attains the age of 65 years
He may resign from his office by submitting a letter of resignation to the President
Impeachment
The process by which a judge of the Supreme Court can be removed on the grounds of proved misbehaviour or incapacity
Impeachment of a Supreme Court judge
Order passed by two-thirds majority of the membership present and voting of both Houses of the Parliament
Salaries of Supreme Court judges
Paid from the Consolidated Fund of India and cannot be voted upon by the Parliament
Cannot be reduced to their disadvantage during their tenure, except during a period of financial emergency
Independence of the judiciary from the executive and legislature
Judges appointed by the President in consultation with the Prime Minister, Cabinet and other judges
Difficult procedure to remove judges, requiring two-thirds majority in both Houses of Parliament
Judges can remain in office until 65 years of age and cannot be removed except by impeachment
Salaries and allowances charged on Consolidated Fund, cannot be reduced
Judges free to announce decisions, which cannot be criticized publicly
Supreme Court can punish for contempt of court
No debate or discussion in Parliament on judge's conduct or decisions
Judges not allowed to continue practice after retirement
Original jurisdiction of the Supreme Court
Cases that directly originate in the Supreme Court and cannot be moved to any other courts
Disputes between the Government of India and one or more states, or between two or more states
Cases where an individual's fundamental rights are denied or taken away by the government
The Supreme Court(Number of Judges) Amendment Act, 2019, which received the assent of the President of India on august 9,2019, increased the number of judges of Supreme Court(Excluding Chief Justice) from 30 to 33
USA - Double Judicial set-up
Need for Single Independent Judiciary in India
In a representative democracy, administration of justice assumes special significance in view of the rights of individuals, which need protection against executive or legislative inference
This protection is given by making the judiciary independent of the other two organs of the govt
Independent and supreme judiciary
An essential requirement of a federal governance
In a federal set-up, there is a constitutional division of powers between the executive, legislature and judiciary
The supreme court not only safeguards the distributions of these powers but also prevents any action that violates the limitations imposed by the constitution
Independent and impartial judiciary
An essential requisite ensuring human rights and protecting democracy
When Chief Justice is unable to perform the duties of his/her office by reason of absence or otherwise, the President may appoint another judge of supreme court as the acting chief justice
Chief justice may at any time with previous consent of president request attendance of retired judges of supreme court or high courts to act as judge of supreme court
Independence of Judiciary from the control of executive and legislature:
Appointment of judges
Removal of judges
Security of tenure
Security of Salaries and serviceconditions
Freedom to announcedecisions and decrees
Punishment for contempt of court
Full control over procedure of work and establishment
No discussion in the legislature on the conduct of judges
Prohibition of practice after retirement
Appointment of judges: Every judge of the supreme court is appointed by the president after consultation with the cabinet as well as the judges of supreme court as well as high court. Thus the judiciary and executive are involved in the appointment of judges
Removal of judges: The judges cannot be removed from office by any authority through a normal simple procedure. A judge can be removed by the president only for proved misbehavior and incapacity. This charge needs to be proved by a joint address by both houses of parliament and supported by a two thirds majority of members present and voting An address can only be presented after an allegation has been thoroughly examined by some impartial tribunal
jurisdiction - power that a court of law exercises to carry out judgements and enforce laws
Original jurisdiction
Cases that directly originate in the Supreme Court and cannot be moved to any other courts than the Supreme Court
Cases that can directly originate in the Supreme Court
When any dispute emerges between the Government of India and one or more states
When disputes arise between the Government of India and one or more states and one or more states
When disputes arise between two or more states
Individual approaching Supreme Court
When any of his/her fundamental rights are denied or are taken away by the government(under original jurisdiction)
Supreme Court transferring a case from High Court
Under article 139 A, inserted by the 44th amendment act of 1978, the supreme court may transfer itself cases from one or more high courts if these involve a question of law or are cases of great importance (under original jurisdiction)
All cases where the interpretation of the Constitution is required can be directly filed in the Supreme Court
Original jurisdiction - power to hear and determine a dispute in the first instance
Appellate jurisdiction
power to grant special leave to appeal against judgement delivered by any court in the country
Matters under appellate jurisdiction
Constitutional cases
Civil cases
Criminal cases
Constitutional cases
All matters under the High Court which involves the interpretation of the Constitution can be brought before the Supreme Court
Civil cases
Appeals can be made to the Supreme Court if the High Court certifies that (a) The case involves an important question of law of generalimportance. (b) The case needs to be decided by the Supreme Court. (c) If the High Court refuses to give a certificate, the Supreme Court can grant special leave to appeal in certain cases
Criminal cases
Two types of appeals in criminal cases can be referred to the Supreme Court if cases with or without the certificate lie before the High Court. The certificate of the High Court is not required in a case where (i) The High Court has reversed the judgement given by the lower court of acquittal and punished the accused with a death sentence. (ii)The High Court withdraws a case from the lower court and gives death sentence to the accused
Advisory Jurisdiction
The Supreme Court has an advisory jurisdiction on any question of law/fact of public importance which is referred to it by the President. It gives its advice under the following circumstances:
If the President feels that any law is of extreme public importance, he can ask for the advice of the Supreme Court. However, such advice is not binding on the President or the government.
Disputes which arise out of pre-Constitutional treaties and agreements which are excluded in the original jurisdiction can be referred to the Supreme Court for advisoryjurisdiction
Revisory Jurisdiction The Supreme Court(under A 137) has the power to review any judgement with a view to undo any erroneous decision given by it. This is important because the Supreme Court is also a court of record and its decisions may be referred by other courts while giving judgments.
Judicial Review
The Supreme Court's power to review any law passed by the government and declare it null and void (ultra vires) if it violates any provision made in the Constitution
Can review all national and state laws and executive orders
Can declare laws null and void if they do not conform to the spirit of the Constitution
2. In a federal setup like that of India, if any disputes arise between state and central governments. The Supreme Court can settle disputes between them
3. In the Constitution, a law may be ambiguously written. The Supreme Court has the power to settle disputes over the interpretation of law
Acts of Parliament declared null and void:
Presidential order concerning derecognition of former princes
Banking Companies Act(1969) - nationalization of 14 banks
August 1999 - 'merit' should be the sole criterion for admissions to pg and other higher courses in medicine and engineering