Two or more persons, interacting and interdependent, who have come together to achieve certain objectives
Types of groups
Formal group
Informal group
Formal group
Defined by the organization structure, with designated work assignments and established tasks
Formal group
Economics area of a university consisting of six faculty members and an area chairman
Informal group
Neither formally structured nor organizationally determined, formed by individuals and developed around common interests and friendship rather than around a deliberate design
Informal group
Group of six faculty members of a university who love music and bring their musical instruments to play together outside the university
Types of formal groups
Command group
Task group
Command group
Group composed of individuals who report directly to a certain manager
Command group
Sales supervisor and his ten salesmen
Task group
Group consisting of persons working together to complete a job task
Task group
Group of five faculty members from different departments coordinating and preparing the semester enrollment program of the university
Types of informal groups
Interest group
Friendship group
Interest group
Formed because of some special topic interest, group disbands when the interest declines or a goal has been achieved
Interest group
Employees with young children grouping together to present a unified front to management for some benefits like allowances for child care
Friendship group
Members are brought together because they share one or more common characteristics such as age, political beliefs, or ethnic background, and often extend their interaction and communication to activities outside of their jobs
Reasons why people form groups
Satisfy social needs
Proximity
Similarities in perception, attitude, performance, or motivation
Achieve a goal
Obtain economic benefits
Stages of group development
1. Forming
2. Storming
3. Norming
4. Performing
5. Adjourning
Forming stage
Initial entry of members, characterized by uncertainty about the group's purpose, structure, and leadership
Storming stage
Conflict within the group, competition for desired assignments and disagreements over appropriate behaviors and responsibilities
Norming stage
Group really begins to come together as a coordinated unit, cooperation and collaboration are main characteristics
Performing stage
Group emerges as a mature, organized, and well-functioning group, ready to focus on accomplishing its key tasks
Adjourning stage
Termination of group activities, triggered by the group's purpose being fulfilled or the group failing to revitalize itself
Roles within groups
Knowledge contributor
Process observer
People supporter
Challenger
Listener
Mediator
Gatekeeper
Take-charge leader
Knowledge contributor
Provides useful and valid information, helps in task accomplishment and sharing technical expertise
Process observer
Forces members to look at how the group functions, first to acknowledge excellent group performance
People supporter
Provides emotional support to teammates and resolves conflicts, listens actively and makes others feel relaxed
Challenger
Confronts and challenges bad ideas, prevents satisfaction and non-critical thinking
Listener
Listens to ideas and proposals presented by group members
Mediator
Resolves disputes between group members to avoid affecting group performance
Gatekeeper
Provides opportunity for every member to express their opinion, reminds members of good ideas presented previously
Take-charge leader
Assumes leadership role when the group has no appointed leader or the leader cannot play their role, defines the group's mission and objectives
Advantages of working in a group
More inputs from various perspectives
Synergism more likely
Members more supportive of decisions
Efficient exchange of information
Fulfilling safety, affiliation, and esteem needs
Mutual support
Disadvantages of working in a group
Slower and more cumbersome activity
Routine data could be conveyed more efficiently in writing
Diluted decisions
Accountability issues
Avoidance of responsibility
Ignoring outside criticism
The disadvantage of working in a group is actually referred to as "Groupthink"
Advantages of groups
Members have access to more information and resources
Group members get mutual support from each other
Disadvantages of groups
Group activity is usually slower and more cumbersome because every member has the opportunity to make contributions
Group meetings are held to disseminate strictly routine data that could be more efficiently conveyed in writing through interoffice memorandum. When this happens, the effectiveness of the group is undermined
The group's decision may be diluted by every member's input making the decision ineffective
Accountability is often a problem with group activity
There are occasions when some members avoid responsibility and let other members of the group do the work
When the group is highly cohesive and motivated, outside criticism tends to be ignored as group members look inward for reinforcement of each other's opinions
Groupthink
A deterioration of mental efficiency, reality testing, and moral judgment in the interest of group cohesiveness. Individual thinking is brought in line with the average quality of the group's thinking.
Ways to minimize groupthink
Monitoring group size, so it will not grow large enough to intimidate some members to perform well
Encouraging group leaders to play an impartial role by actively seeking input from all members and avoid expressing their own opinions, especially in the early stages of deliberation
Appointing a member to play the role of devil's advocate
Using exercises that stimulate active discussion of diverse alternatives without threatening the group and intensifying identity protection
Interacting groups
Typical groups in which members interact with each other face-to-face. The essence of interaction is the sending and receiving of information through oral, written, and nonverbal communication.
Brainstorming
A group problem-solving technique which promotes creativity by encouraging members to come up with any ideas, no matter how strange, without fear of criticism.