Watson and Rayner's research was conducted out before ethical guidelines were developed
If the current ethical guidelines are applied to Little Albert's study there are shortcomings with this research
The study would not be considered to be ECAL since Little Albert prior to the experiment was not easily frightened, but throughout the experiment became more fearful of many other situations as well
Watson and Rayner did not fully protect Little Albert from psychological harm
The research
It was an experimental case study and therefore only focused on one individual-Little Albert
The results are not GENERALISABLE to a wider population
It was completed in a laboratory setting and this therefore means was not representative of a natural environment and therefore lacked ecological validity
Reductionism applies to the learning theories since the theories reduce behaviour down to one cause
Watson and Rayner's study applies classical conditioning principles to explaining how a fear response is learnt in children
Little Albert's behaviour is created through the paired association on the conditioned stimulus to the conditioned response, thus reducing a phobic explanation only to the pairing of two stimuli
This therefore ignores other factors such as cognitive or social factors that could contribute to these behaviours
Watson and Rayner's study focuses upon the application of classical conditioning and how it explains phobias occurring through the pairing of the unconditioned stimulus and conditioned stimulus together to develop a conditioned response
This also links to the treatment section of phobias as to how psychologists can break the learnt association between the conditioned stimulus and conditioned response to recondition a phobia and thus treat an individual who has a phobia
Watson and Rayner's study was another ground-breaking study
It indicated through scientific testing in laboratory conditions that fear responses can be learnt
There were strict controls which were used and only one variable was changed at one time, this in turn increases the VALIDITY of the study
An example of the controls used by Watson and Rayner were the use of the blocks and this allowed for Watson and Rayner to make comparisons between Little Albert's fear responses accurately
Little Albert was a baby boy and his mother was a wet nurse
This indicates that there are issues that relate to the psychological research
Nurture-Watson and Rayner's study supports the nurture side of the debate since it believes that all individuals are born as a blank slate (tabula rasa) and every experience teaches an individual a new behaviour which in turn shapes and forms who they are
Therefore Little Albert's phobia was only caused by the experiences he was exposed to by Watson and Rayner
Watson and Rayner's study is one of the most influential pieces of psychological research in explaining phobias
The research is still relevant today and it continues to be the basis of psychological understanding
Cognitive behavioural therapy
The most effective form of treatment to treat anxiety conditions
The use of psychology in social control
1. The findings from Watson and Rayner indicated that fear could be learnt
2. This led to the understanding that it could also be unlearnt
3. Systematic desensitisation was formally developed
Through systematic desensitisation therapy
A therapist would have responsibility of power over another person
They can dictate the speed to which the exposure occurs
They have to contain the anxiety of the individual in therapy
This could be deemed as controlling in this situation
Watson and Rayner's study
It had a huge impact on the psychological industry due to the scientific rigour of this experiment
It provides an explanation as to how a behaviour is learnt
It determined that a behaviour can be learnt, it can therefore also be unlearnt through treatments
This finding is the foundation and basis for the most effective way to treat anxiety difficulties through cognitive behavioural therapy
Watson & Rayner's research could be seen as socially sensitive as it proposes that a phobia or fear of an object can be learnt
This fear/phobia can be generalised to other stimuli which can increase the phobia
As Little Albert's fear was induced this could be seen as brainwashing
watson and raynor support psychology as a science as they have high validity due to use of controls( use of blocks) which allowed comparisons between albert and fear responses accurately
Harmful behaviour to animals
Skinner electrified rats
Pavlov restricted food (to an extent)
Watson + Rayner deliberately distressed Little Albert (who was never debriefed/desensitised)
Bandura caused distress and frustrated children by exposing them to aggressive models
Learning cannot generalise findings from animals to humans as animals don't have self-awareness like humans do
Humans have self-awareness so show demand characteristics
Behaviourists (like Skinner) are happy to explain all behaviour as an outcome of previous learning and we behave the way we do due to the sum of our experiences
Classical and operant conditioning
Explain behaviour as due to stimulus-response connections, which are basic units used to explain complex behaviour
Bandura takes into account both behavioural and cognitive factors in observational learning and imitation
Phobias
Can be explained in many different ways including learning theories, biology, psychodynamic and cognitive approaches
Usually can explain a behaviour with all the learning theories so should consider which is the most appropriate
Behaviourists use testable hypotheses, collect empirical data and use objective methods
Learning theories are based on nurture so different cultures will have different experiences that affect development, and specific behaviours deemed acceptable will be reinforced