He wanted to understand the behaviour of Germans in the Holocaust
He wanted to see if ppts would follow orders from authority figure whilst experiencing moral strain
Who were the participants?
40 male americans
20-50 years old
How was the sample obtained?
Newspaper ad for a 'memory research test' - volunteer sample
What was the method?
teacher told to administer an increasingly sever electric shock onto the learner every time they got a question wrong on a word pairing task
What was the electric shock voltage range?
15v to 450v
What happened if the teacher refused to carry on?
they were encouraged to carry on through a series of phrases
What are two examples of prompts used?
- Please carry on
- you have no other choice, you must go on
What voltage did all PP's go to?
300v
What % went to the full 450v?
65%
What % stopped at 300v?
12.5%
What did these findings show?
Showed americans were just as obedient to follow extreme orders
Strength - supporting evidence (Hofling 1966)
Studied nurses on a hospital ward and found 21 out of 22 nurses obeyed orders from a 'Dr Smith' to administer a drug, which went against hospital policy
Weakness - Lacks internal validity
Many suggested the likely situation was that the PP's realised the set up wasn't real so were just showing demand characteristics
What did MIilgram argue to the criticism of lacking internal validity?
He reported 70% of participants said they believed the shocks were real
Weakness - ethics
Major issue was the potential psychological harm to patients
How were the ethical issues overcome?
Cost benefit analysis - the benefits to society were seen to outweigh the potential harm caused to a small number of participants
The experiment was conducted at Yale University.
Each participant received $4.50 for their participation.