A legalprocess whereby a person is put to death by the state as a punishment for a crime
Capital offences
Crimes that can result in a death penalty
Capital punishment was formally abolished in the UK in 1998 (the last execution was in 1964)
Crimes resulting in the death penalty in some countries
Drug related offences
Adultery
Blasphemy
Grossly unfair trials and executions of people who were under the age of 18 at the time of the crime
Secrecy still surrounds the use of the death penalty in many countries
Numerous governments still continue to ignore international legal standards
China, Iran, Saudi Arabia and Singapore executed people for drug related offences in 2022
This is in violation of international human rights law which prohibits the death penalty for crimes which do not meet the threshold for the 'most serious crimes'
Methods used for capital punishment around the world
Hanging
Poison gas
Hanging (if properly conducted)
A humane method where the neck is broken and death comes quickly
If the free-fall distance is inadequate, the prisoner ends up slowly being strangled to death
If the free-fall distance is too great, the rope will tear the prisoner's head off
Poison gas
Cyanide is dropped into acid producing Hydrogen Cyanide, a deadly gas that takes many minutes of agony before a person dies
Capital punishment is a large topic of debate with many moral issues surrounding it
Taking away a human life
Goes against the human right article 3 which prohibits torture and inhuman or degrading treatment or punishment
Sooner or later innocent people will be killed by mistakes when identifying criminals
When people see our human rights being ignored, they will have more fear over the power that the government has and how we aren't as protected as we believe we are
Humanists don't support capital punishment
Amnesty International is against capital punishment because it takes away the right to life and is irreversible
Since 1973, more than 191 prisoners sent to death row in the USA have later been exonerated or released from death row on grounds of innocence
In many cases, people were executed after being convicted in grossly unfair trials, on the basis of torture-tainted evidence and with inadequate legal representation
In some countries death sentences are imposed as the mandatory punishment for certain offences, meaning that judges are not able to consider the circumstances of the crime or of the defendant before sentencing
I disagree with the statement that some people lose their right to life when they take away the lives of others
Premeditated killing
Requires that the defendant had intent to kill and some willful deliberation to kill, rather than killing on a sudden impulse
The criminal may become comfortable knowing that they are going to be killed
Once the decision has been made, the criminal knows when they are going to die and how it will be done, many criminals find comfort within this as they know they have an easy way out and won't have to suffer any longer
This has negative consequences as it doesn't give justice to the victim or their families
Humanists believe that premeditated killing is wrong and don't understand how it could be justified
The Humanist approach would be to look at the evidence to see if this checks out
Humanists think we shouldn't believe in ideas just because we like them or wish they were true
Humanists believe that prisoners should suffer, but they shouldn't lose their lives over a crime
There is evidence that capital punishment doesn't deter crime
The USA is one of the few democracies that retains capital punishment, and yet it has one of the highest murder rates among Western democracies
When capital punishment was abolished in some states, the number of murders did not rise
Certainty has a greater impact on deterrence than severity of punishment, capital punishment being the most severe
Studies show that for most individuals convicted of a crime, short to moderate prison sentences may be a deterrent but longer prison terms produce only a limited deterrent effect
Taking a prisoner's life doesn't help any situations and it's evident that it doesn't stop criminals from committing dangerous crimes
It can also be argued that people may commit crimes to receive the death penalty as it is an easy way out for them, which again increases the level of crime in a city
Amnesty International believes that capital punishment doesn't deter crime and there is no evidence that it's effective