How often do mothers pick up on a babies sign to get attention?
2/3
InteractionalSynchrony
When the infant and caregiver mirror each other’s actions whilst interacting
Reciprocity
When an infant responds to the actions of the caregiver with similar actions
Grossmann (2002)
Carried out a longitudinal study looking at both parents‘ behaviour and its relationship to the quality of attachment into teen years
Father’s play sensitivity was a better predictor of the child’s long-term attachment than early measures of attachment
Fathers as primary caregivers
Field (1978) filmed 4 month old babies with caregivers. Fathers who were primary caregivers smiled more and spend more time holding the infant than secondary caregiver fathers
Caregiver-infant interaction evaluation
Data from infant observation
Observations are well-controlled so can capture fine detail
Don’t know the purpose of reciprocity and interactionalsynchrony - Feldman (2012)
Role of father evaluation
Inconsistent research due to research questions asked
If role of the father is important, why aren’t children who grow up without fathersdifferent?
We don’t often see fathers as primary attachment figures
Who studied the stages of attachment?
Schaffer and Emerson (1964)
Stages of attachment
Asocialstage (first few weeks)
Indiscriminateattachment (2-7 months)
Specificattachment (7+ months)
Multipleattachment
Schaffer and Emerson evaluation
Can’t generalise results: working-class population from Glasgow
May lack temporal validity
Self-report
Are all attachments equal in multiple attachment stage?
Who suggested that attachment happens through conditioning?
DollandandMiller (1950)
Classical conditioning attachment
Milk (UCS) = Happiness (UCR)
Mum (NS) = No response
Milk + Mum = Happiness
Mum (CS) = Happiness (CR)
Operant conditioning attachment
Hungry infant feels uncomfortable. Food is a negative reward as it takes away the hunger. Food is the primary reinforcer. Parent is the secondary reinforcer
Who suggested that attachment happens through social learning?
Dale Hay and Jo Vespo
Social learning theory of attachment
Modelling: children observe their parents’ affectionate behaviour and imitate this
Rewarded attachment behaviours, such as hugs and kisses
Learning theory evaluation
Based on animal studies (Skinner, Pavlov)
Can explain role of association in attachment
Emphasis on the role of food
Bowlby suggested that attachment is innate and is an evolutionary survival method
Lorenz
His research suggests that organisms have a biological tendency to form attachments
He studied imprinting in geese
Goslings were hatched either in an incubator or with their mother, those from the incubator saw Lorenz first and imprinted onto him
Imprinting operates in a critical period
Suggests that attachment models futurerelationships
Lorenz evaluation
Can’t be generalised
Harlow
Rhesus monkeys were caged from infancy with a wire food-dispensing surrogate mother and a cloth-covered surrogate mother
The monkeys displayed attachment behaviour towards the cloth-covered mother when scared
They were willing to explore a room but only when they could use the cloth-covered mother as a safe-base
These monkeys had dysfunctional adult behaviour (timid,unpredictable, difficulty mating, the females were inadequate mothers)
Harlow evaluation
Can’t generalise to humans
Unethical
Bowlby’s theory of attachment
Attachments happen both ways
Critical period (3-6 months old)
Sensitivity of caregiver
Social releases
Monotropy
Internal working model
Continuity hypothesis
What is the critical period for attachment according to Bowlby?
3-6 months
Social releases
Behaviour displayed by babies to ‘unlock’ the innate tendency of adults to care for them. Can be physical (baby face) or behavioural (crying, cooing, smiling)
Monotropy
A superior attachment with the primary caregiver, usually the mother. If the mother isn’t available then the baby can attach to a mother-substitute who is an ever-present adult. Secondary attachments act as emotional safety nets
The continuity hypothesis
Individuals who are strongly attached in infancy continue to be socially and emotionally competent whilst those who are not strongly attached have social and emotional difficulties in childhood and adulthood
Bowlby’s theory of attachment evaluation
May not be critical for survival
Attachments can form after critical period - Rutter et al
Grossman and Grossman support difference in primary and secondary attachment
Who developed the Strange Situation?
Mary Ainsworth
How was data recorded in the Strange Situation?
Group observation using a video recorder or two-way mirror
Behavioural categories in the Strange Situation
Proximity and contact-seeking behaviour
Contact-maintaining behaviour
Proximity and interaction-avoiding behaviour
Contact and interaction-resisting behaviour
Search behaviour
Each item was scored for intensity in a scale from 1 to 7
Strange Situation findings
66% secure attachment
22% insecure-avoidant attachment
12% insecure-resistant attachment
Secure attachment
Confident that attachment figure is available ti meet needs
Use attachment figure as a safe-base
Seek the attachment figure at times of distress
Easily soothed by attachment figure when distressed
Insecure-avoidant attachment
Do not orientate to attachment figure when exploring environement
Independent both physically and emotionally
Don’t seek contact with figure when distressed
Parent of insecure-avoidant child
Insensitive and rejecting of child’s needs, may withdraw from helping during difficult tasks, often unavailable during times of emotional distress
Parent of securely attached child
Sensitive to child’s signals and responds appropriately to their needs
Insecure-resistant attachment
Clingy and dependant towards attachment figure
Rejecting of attachment figure when they engage in interaction
Lacks feelings of security from figure
Have difficulty moving away from attachment figure and exploring
Difficult to sooth when distressed as they aren’t comforted by interaction with attachment figure