The practice of writers to review and provide constructive criticism of each other's work
Criteria for Critiquing
Coherence and organization of paragraphs
Development of literary elements
Use of factual information
Other qualities concerning form and content
Coherence
Relates to the macro-level features of a text, which help it to make sense as a whole. It means that sentences are arranged in a logical manner, making them easily understood by the reader.
Organization
Achieved when ideas are logically and accurately arranged. Organization means that your argument flows logically from one point to the next.
Cohesion
Relates to the micro-level features of the text, ensuring that the words and sentences you use join or stick together.
Literary elements
Particular identifiable characteristics of a whole text.
Factual information
Creative nonfiction is about fact and truth. The truth can be about a personal experience, event, or issue in the public eye.
Other qualities concerning form and content
Language use
Mechanics
Language use
Refers to the communicative meaning of language. It can be compared to usage, which refers to the rules for making language and the structures we use to make it.
Mechanics
Refers to the written language, such as capitalization, punctuation, and spelling.
Peer Critique Guidelines
Be kind
Be specific
Be helpful
Participate
Be Kind
Always treat others with dignity and respect.
Be specific
Focus on particular strengths and weaknesses, rather than making general comments.
Be Helpful
The goal is to positively contribute to the individual or the group, not to simply be heard.
Participate
Peer critique is a process to support each other, and your feedback is valued.
Do's
Read the piece several times ahead of time
Try to experience the piece as an "ordinary reader" before you consider it as an author or editor
Try to understand the author's goals
Be specific in your feedback and provide relevant examples
Don'ts
Impose your own aesthetics, tastes, or world view
Rewrite the story the way you would have written it
Discourage the author
Offer criticisms that are too general to help the author make specific improvements