The process of introducing market forces it consumer choice and competition between suppliers, into areas ran by the state.
Marketisation has created an 'educationmarket'
How marketisation has created an 'education market'
1. Reducing directstatecontrol
2. Increasing competitionbetweenschools
3. Increasing parentalchoice
Policies to promote marketisation and modernization
League tables
OFSTED inspections
Business sponsorship
Open enrolment
Specialist schools
Formula funding
Academies
Schools competing to attract pupils
Introduction of tuition fees for higher education
Allowing people to set up free schools
David, Parentocracy
Power shifts away from teachers/schools onto parents, encouraging diversity and giving parents more choice and raisingstandards
What do Ball And Whitty say?
Policies such as examleaguetables and fundingformula reproduce classinequalities between schools
Marketisation and parentocracy
Increase inequality
Marketisation policies reproduce class inequalities between schools
Exam league tables
Parents are attracted to schools with good league tables, Bartlett states this encourages creamskimming and siltshifting.
Schools with lower positions in league tables
Can't afford to be selective and have to take less able workingclass pupils, remaining unattractive to middle class parents
The overall effect of league tables
Is to produce unequalschools that reproduce social class inequalities
Funding formula
Schools are allocated funds based on how many pupils they attract, so popular schools get more funds and can afford better quality teachers and facilities, allowing them to be more selective
Unpopular schools lose funds and find it difficult to meet the quality of competing schools, failing to attract pupils and having their fundingreduced further
A study by the institute for publicpolicy found that Competition-oriented education systems produce more segregation between children of different social backgrounds
Parental choice, Gewirtz
The economic and cultural capital of middle class parents puts them at an advantage to choose 'good' schools
Types of parents
Privileged-skilled choosers
Disconnected-local choosers
Semi-skilled choosers
Ball believes that Marketisation gives the appearance of a 'parentocracy', where it seems as if parents are getting a freechoice of school
In reality, as gewirtz shows, the parents who are better able to take advantage of the choices available are those who can afford to move into the catchmentareas of more desirable schools
Parentocracy makes inequality in education appear fair and inevitable
Policies aimed at reducing inequality- new labour
Designating deprived areas as EducationActionZones and providing them with moreresources
The AimHigher programme to raise educational aspirations of those underrepresented in higher education
EducationMaintenanceAllowances for low income backgrounds
Introduction of the National Literacy Strategy
CityAcademies for workingclass pupils
Increased funding for state education
Cream skimming
’good‘ schools can be more selective and choose their own customers, recruiting highachieving,middleclass pupils, these students therefore gain an advantage.
Silt shifting
‘good‘ schools can avoid taking lessable pupils who are likely to get poor results and damage the schools position in the leaguetables