Profits are likely to be lower than a market with only a few large firms
Profit maximising equilibrium in the short run
1. Firm produces output Q1
2. Firm earns supernormal profits (shaded area)
Profit maximising equilibrium in the long run
1. New firms enter the market
2. Supply increases, causing price to fall
3. Firms only make normal profits in the long run
Advantages of perfect competition
Lower price in the long run
Productive efficiency
Supernormal profits in the short run may increase dynamic efficiency
Disadvantages of perfect competition
Limited dynamic efficiency in the long run
Few or no economies of scale
Assumptions rarely apply in real life
Monopolistically competitive market
Imperfect competition
Firms sell non-homogeneous products due to branding
Large number of buyers and sellers
Firms compete using non-price competition
No barriers to entry or exit
Firms have some degree of price setting power
Buyers and sellers have imperfect information
Profit maximising equilibrium in the short run
1. Firm produces output where MC = MR
2. Firm earns supernormal profits (shaded area)
Profit maximising equilibrium in the long run
1. New firms enter the market
2. Demand curve shifts left
3. Firms only make normal profits in the long run
Advantages of monopolistic competition
Consumers get a wide variety of choice
Model is more realistic than perfect competition
Supernormal profits in the short run may increase dynamic efficiency
Disadvantages of monopolistic competition
Allocative inefficiency in short and long run
Productive inefficiency due to excess capacity
X-inefficiency due to lack of incentive to minimise costs
Oligopoly
High barriers to entry and exit
High concentration ratio
Interdependence of firms
Product differentiation
Collusive oligopoly
Firms agree to work together, e.g. set price or output, to minimise competition
Non-collusive oligopoly
Firms compete against each other
Collusion is more likely when there are few firms, similar costs, high entry barriers, hard to be caught, ineffective competition policy, and consumer inertia
Collusion can be overt (formal agreement) or tacit (unspoken agreement)
Overt collusion is illegal in the EU, US and several other countries
Non-collusive oligopoly is more likely when there are several firms, one firm has a significant cost advantage, products are homogeneous, and the market is saturated</b>
Collusion
Agreements made by firms to maximise their own benefits and restrict output, causing market price to increase. This deters new entrants and is anti-competitive.
Factors making collusion more likely
Few firms
Similar costs
High entry barriers
Difficult to be caught
Ineffective competition policy
Consumer inertia
Overt collusion
Formal agreement made between firms. It is illegal in the EU, US and several other countries.
Tacit collusion
No formal agreement, but collusion is implied.
Cooperation is allowed in the market, whilst collusion is not. Collusion is usually with poor intentions, whilst cooperation will be beneficial.
Collusion generally refers to market variables, such as quantity produced, price per unit and marketing expenditure. Cooperation might refer to how a firm is organised and how production is managed.
Kinked demand curve model
Illustrates the feature of price stability in an oligopoly. It assumes other firms have an asymmetric reaction to a price change by another firm.
If price increases from P1 to P3
Other firms do not react, so the firm which increases their price loses a significant proportion of market share (Q1 to Q3)
If the firm decreases their price from P1 to P2
The firm only gains a relatively small increase in market share (Q1 to Q2)
Cartel
A group of two or more firms which have agreed to control prices, limit output, or prevent the entrance of new firms into the market.
Cartels can lead to higher prices for consumers and restricted outputs. Some cartels might involve dividing the market up, so firms agree not to compete in each other's markets.
Price leadership
One firm changes their prices, and other firms follow. This firm is usually the dominant firm in the market.
Price war
A type of price competition, which involves firms constantly cutting their prices below that of its competitors.
Non-price competition
Aims to increase the loyalty to a brand, which makes demand for a good more price inelastic.
Examples: improved customer service, longer opening hours, special offers, advertising and marketing
Barriers to entry
Designed to prevent new firms entering the market profitably. This increases producer surplus.
Game theory
Used to predict the outcome of a decision made by one firm, when it has incomplete information about the other firm.
Prisoner's Dilemma
A model based around two prisoners, who have the choice to either confess or deny a crime. The consequences of the choice depend on what the other prisoner chooses.
Nash equilibrium
A concept in game theory which describes the optimal strategy for all players, whilst taking into account what opponents have chosen. They cannot improve their position given the choice of the other.
Disadvantages of oligopoly
Higher prices and profits and inefficiency may result in a misallocation of resources
Collusion could reinforce the monopoly power of existing firms and makes it hard for new firms to enter
Absence of competition means efficiency falls
Advantages of oligopoly
Firms are more likely to innovate if they can protect their ideas
Industry standards could improve
Higher profits could be a source of government revenue