we have obligation not to perform an act that causes harm to others
The Harm Principle Objection:
it centers around the idea that individual actions contributing to harm, such as greenhouse gas emissions in the context of global warming, are not sufficient or necessary to cause the harm itself
the indirect harm principle
we have a moral obligation not to perform an act that causes harm to others indirectly by causing someone to carry out acts that cause harm to others
the indirect harm principle objection
insinuates that it is on every person morally, whenever doing something that indirectly causes harm like going for a joy ride shouldn’t be put on the person, morally
the contribution principle
we have a moral obligation not to make problems worse
the contribution principle objection
things would be just as bad if i didn’t do the thing
the risk principle
individuals are morally responsible for their actions if they engage in behavior that creates an unjustifiable risk of harm to others, even if no actual harm occurs
the risk principle objection
People should not be held morally responsible for things that are beyond their control such as accidents or events that do not result in harm despite posing a risk